AreasYour bodyFood, caffeine and fuel

Five minutesAny ordinary dayMedical and treatmentYour body

Most claims about food and behaviour rest on weak studies. The ones worth taking seriously give each person both the real thing and a dummy at different times, with nobody knowing which is which, so that hope and expectation cannot do the work.

The food colouring trials are the standard example. Around 150 children each received drinks containing a preservative plus one of two dye mixes, or a placebo, with the order varied and everyone blinded. Hyperactivity rose in the general population of children tested, which is not the same as saying dyes cause ADHD. Holding that distinction is what keeps you from either dismissing the finding or inflating it.

Qur’an and Sunnah

They are those who are neither wasteful nor niggardly when they spend, but keep to a just balance (Quran 25:67). A just balance is what is wanted with evidence too, neither swallowing a claim whole nor waving it away.

وَٱلَّذِينَ إِذَآ أَنفَقُواْ لَمۡ يُسۡرِفُواْ وَلَمۡ يَقۡتُرُواْ وَكَانَ بَيۡنَ ذَٰلِكَ قَوَامࣰ ا

They are those who are neither wasteful nor niggardly when they spend, but keep to a just balance

Qur’an 25:67read it in the library

Translation: M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, The Qur'an, Oxford University Press, 2004.

What the research says

The same design standard runs through the nutrition literature. An early meta-analysis of double blind placebo controlled trials found a significant antidepressant effect of omega-3 while flagging substantial variation between the trials pooled. Both halves of that sentence matter. Blinding makes a result worth taking seriously, and variation between trials is a reason to hold the size of it loosely.

Lin PY, Su KP. (2007). A meta-analytic review of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressant efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids.. The Journal of clinical psychiatry doi

Strength of evidence: one line of research. A single study, or a theoretical account.

Why it works

When each person acts as their own comparison and nobody knows what they were given, a result is much harder to explain away.

This one is still a draft. It is waiting on a scholar and a clinician to read it before it is published.

Near this one

More on your body