Search the source libraries

The global burden of perinatal common mental health disorders and substance use among migrant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: There are one billion migrants globally, of whom 82 million are forced migrants. Pregnant migrants face pre-migration stressors such as conflict, transit stressors including poverty, and post-migration stressors including navigating the immigration system; these stressors can make them vulnerable to mental illness. We aimed to assess the global prevalence of and risk factors for perinatal mental health disorders or substance use among women who are migrants. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched OVID MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Global Health, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from database inception until July 8, 2022. Cohort, cross-sectional, and interventional studies with prevalence data for any mental illness in pregnancy or the postnatal period (ie, up to a year after delivery) or substance use in pregnancy were included. The primary outcome was the prevalence of perinatal common mental health disorders among women who are migrants, globally. Data for study quality and risk factors were also extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates, when appropriate. Sensitivity analyses were conducted according to study quality, sample representativeness, and method of outcome assessment. Risk factor data were synthesised narratively. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021226291. Findings: 18 650 studies were retrieved, of which 135 studies comprising data from 621 995 participants met the inclusion criteria. 123 (91%) of 135 studies were conducted in high-income host countries. Five (4%) of 135 studies were interventional, 40 (30%) were cohort, and 90 (66%) were cross-sectional. The most common regions of origin of participants were South America, the Middle East, and north Africa. Only 26 studies presented disaggregated data for forced migrants or economic migrants. The pooled prevalence of perinatal depressive disorders was 24·2% (range 0·5-95·5%; I2 98·8%; τ2 0·01) among all women who are migrants, 32·5% (1·5-81·6; 98·7%; 0·01) among forced migrants, and 13·7% (4·7-35·1; 91·5%; 0·01) among economic migrants (p<0·001). The pooled prevalence of perinatal anxiety disorders was 19·6% (range 1·2-53·1; I2 96·8%; τ2 0·01) among all migrants. The pooled prevalence of perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among all migrant women was 8·9% (range 3·2-33·3; I2 97·4%; τ2 0·18). The pooled prevalence of perinatal PTSD among forced migrants was 17·1% (range 6·5-44·3; I2 96·6%; τ2 0·32). Key risk factors for perinatal depression were being a recently arrived immigrant (ie, approximately within the past year), having poor social support, and having a poor relationship with one's partner. Interpretation: One in four women who are migrants and who are pregnant or post partum experience perinatal depression, one in five perinatal anxiety, and one in 11 perinatal PTSD. The burden of perinatal mental illness appears higher among women who are forced migrants compared with women who are economic migrants. To our knowledge, we have provided the first pooled estimate of perinatal depression and PTSD among women who are forced migrants. Interpreting the prevalence estimate should be observed with caution due to the very wide range found within the included studies. Additionally, 66% of studies were cross-sectional representing low quality evidence. These findings highlight the need for community-based routine perinatal mental health screening for migrant communities, and access to interventions that are culturally sensitive, particularly for forced migrants who might experience a higher burden of disease than economic migrants. Funding: UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR); March of Dimes European Preterm Birth Research Centre, Imperial College; Imperial College NIHR Biomedical Research Centre; and Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford.

The Lancet. Public health · meta-analysis · 63 citationsread the source →

Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Decreased exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are common in people following lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Exercise training has been demonstrated to confer gains in exercise capacity and HRQoL for people with a range of chronic conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure, as well as in people with prostate and breast cancer. A programme of exercise training may also confer gains in these outcomes for people following lung resection for NSCLC. This systematic review updates our 2013 systematic review. Objectives: The primary aim of this review was to determine the effects of exercise training on exercise capacity and adverse events in people following lung resection (with or without chemotherapy) for NSCLC. The secondary aims were to determine the effects of exercise training on other outcomes such as HRQoL, force-generating capacity of peripheral muscles, pressure-generating capacity of the respiratory muscles, dyspnoea and fatigue, feelings of anxiety and depression, lung function, and mortality. Search methods: We searched for additional randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (the Cochrane Library 2019, Issue 2 of 12), MEDLINE (via PubMed) (2013 to February 2019), Embase (via Ovid) (2013 to February 2019), SciELO (The Scientific Electronic Library Online) (2013 to February 2019), and PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database) (2013 to February 2019). Selection criteria: We included RCTs in which participants with NSCLC who underwent lung resection were allocated to receive either exercise training, which included aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, or a combination of both, or no exercise training. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors screened the studies and identified those eligible for inclusion. We used either postintervention values (with their respective standard deviation (SD)) or mean changes (with their respective SD) in the meta-analyses that reported results as mean difference (MD). In meta-analyses that reported results as standardised mean difference (SMD), we placed studies that reported postintervention values and those that reported mean changes in separate subgroups. We assessed the certainty of evidence for each outcome by downgrading or upgrading the evidence according to GRADE criteria. Main results: Along with the three RCTs included in the original version of this review (2013), we identified an additional five RCTs in this update, resulting in a total of eight RCTs involving 450 participants (180 (40%) females). The risk of selection bias in the included studies was low and the risk of performance bias high. Six studies explored the effects of combined aerobic and resistance training; one explored the effects of combined aerobic and inspiratory muscle training; and one explored the effects of combined aerobic, resistance, inspiratory muscle training and balance training. On completion of the intervention period, compared to the control group, exercise capacity expressed as the peak rate of oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and six-minute walk distance (6MWD) was greater in the intervention group (VO2peak: MD 2.97 mL/kg/min, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.93 to 4.02 mL/kg/min, 4 studies, 135 participants, moderate-certainty evidence; 6MWD: MD 57 m, 95% CI 34 to 80 m, 5 studies, 182 participants, high-certainty evidence). One adverse event (hip fracture) related to the intervention was reported in one of the included studies. The intervention group also achieved greater improvements in the physical component of general HRQoL (MD 5.0 points, 95% CI 2.3 to 7.7 points, 4 studies, 208 participants, low-certainty evidence); improved force-generating capacity of the quadriceps muscle (SMD 0.75, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.1, 4 studies, 133 participants, moderate-certainty evidence); and less dyspnoea (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.81 to -0.05, 3 studies, 110 participants, very low-certainty evidence). We observed uncertain effects on the mental component of general HRQoL, disease-specific HRQoL, handgrip force, fatigue, and lung function. There were insufficient data to comment on the effect of exercise training on maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures and feelings of anxiety and depression. Mortality was not reported in the included studies. Authors' conclusions: Exercise training increased exercise capacity and quadriceps muscle force of people following lung resection for NSCLC. Our findings also suggest improvements on the physical component score of general HRQoL and decreased dyspnoea. This systematic review emphasises the importance of exercise training as part of the postoperative management of people with NSCLC.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · meta-analysis · 76 citationsread the source →

Combining whole-school and targeted programs for the reduction of bullying victimization: A randomized, effectiveness trial.

Despite the extensive evaluation of school-based interventions for bullying, victimization remains a significant problem in schools. Bullying victimization is significantly predicted by contextual (school-related) factors. As a consequence whole-school programs have been commonly used to prevent and reduce bullying victimization. Evidence also points to individual risk factors (such as emotional distress) in predicting victimization, yet programs to prevent bullying victimization by changing these individual risks are far less developed. Few studies have approximated "real-world" implementation conditions in their trials. The current effectiveness trial evaluated the combination of a whole-school program designed to prevent bullying perpetration and victimization together with a targeted intervention for at-risk students, teaching them individual and dyadic strategies to reduce their anxiety and manage victimization, allowing schools some latitude to implement programs as they typically would. Students from Grades 3 and 4 (N = 8,732) across 135 schools were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: combined intervention; whole-school intervention only; individual intervention only; and care as usual. Victimization decreased significantly and similarly across all four conditions at 12 and 24 months following baseline. Similar reductions and failure to discriminate conditions were found on other key constructs: anxiety; bullying perpetration; and depression. Possible reasons for the failure to demonstrate victimization prevention differences and lessons learned from this large, effectiveness trial are considered.

Aggressive behavior · randomised controlled trial · 15 citationsread the source →

Harshness Predicts Reproduction in Brazilian Municipalities and US Counties: A Life History Theory Approach.

Psychosocial acceleration theory (PAT) posits that harsh and unpredictable ecologies during childhood can cue humans into developing earlier and more frequent reproduction. This study tested whether variables measuring harsh and unpredictable circumstances in 4,135 Brazilian municipalities and in 2,763 US counties would predict reproductive behavior 10 to 14 years later. Data was extracted from the Brazilian Census and American Community Survey samples. A secondary analysis explored whether the percentage of visible minorities (Black and Indigenous population) would also be a predictor or mediator of the same outcomes. Partial least squares structural equation modeling and multivariate linear regression were used in the analysis of Brazil and US data, respectively. Municipalities with higher rates of lack of resources, with young mothers both married or separated, and with large families with many residents per room were predictive of higher rates of teenage and young adult mothers and of young children in Brazil. Harshness predicted the percentage of young children in US counties, but the direction of this association was mixed. Some findings were contrary to PAT predictions. Divorce rates were negative predictors of reproduction in both countries. Education and employment indicators were not significant predictors of reproduction in Brazil. Higher rates of perceived minorities were not a relevant predictor in Brazil, and they were a negative predictor of the percentage of children in the United States. Findings suggest that harsh ecologies and the proportion of children in the population impact patterns of reproduction a decade later.

Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behaviorread the source →

Effectiveness of paediatric occupational therapy for children with disabilities: A systematic review.

Introduction: Paediatric occupational therapy seeks to improve children's engagement and participation in life roles. A wide variety of intervention approaches exist. Our aim was to summarise the best-available intervention evidence for children with disabilities, to assist families and therapists choose effective care. Methods: We conducted a systematic review (SR) using the Cochrane methodology, and reported findings according to PRISMA. CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, OTSeeker, PEDro, PsycINFO were searched. Two independent reviewers: (i) determined whether studies met inclusion: SR or randomised controlled trial (RCT); an occupational therapy intervention for children with a disability; (ii) categorised interventions based on name, core components and diagnostic population; (iii) rated quality of evidence and determined the strength of recommendation using GRADE criteria; and (iv) made recommendations using the Evidence Alert Traffic Light System. Results: 129 articles met inclusion (n = 75 (58%) SRs; n = 54 (42%)) RCTs, measuring the effectiveness of 52 interventions, across 22 diagnoses, enabling analysis of 135 intervention indications. Thirty percent of the indications assessed (n = 40/135) were graded 'do it' (Green Go); 56% (75/135) 'probably do it' (Yellow Measure); 10% (n = 14/135) 'probably don't do it' (Yellow Measure); and 4% (n = 6/135) 'don't do it' (Red Stop). Green lights were: Behavioural Interventions; Bimanual; Coaching; Cognitive Cog-Fun & CAPS; CO-OP; CIMT; CIMT plus Bimanual; Context-Focused; Ditto; Early Intervention (ABA, Developmental Care); Family Centred Care; Feeding interventions; Goal Directed Training; Handwriting Task-Specific Practice; Home Programs; Joint Attention; Mental Health Interventions; occupational therapy after toxin; Kinesiotape; Pain Management; Parent Education; PECS; Positioning; Pressure Care; Social Skills Training; Treadmill Training and Weight Loss 'Mighty Moves'. Conclusion: Evidence supports 40 intervention indications, with the greatest number at the activities-level of the International Classification of Function. Yellow light interventions should be accompanied by a sensitive outcome measure to monitor progress and red light interventions could be discontinued because effective alternatives existed.

Australian occupational therapy journal · systematic review · 163 citationsread the source →

Cost and Outcome of Behavioural Activation versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression (COBRA): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

Background: Depression is a common, debilitating, and costly disorder. Many patients request psychological therapy, but the best-evidenced therapy-cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-is complex and costly. A simpler therapy-behavioural activation (BA)-might be as effective and cheaper than is CBT. We aimed to establish the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of BA compared with CBT for adults with depression. Methods: In this randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial, we recruited adults aged 18 years or older meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV criteria for major depressive disorder from primary care and psychological therapy services in Devon, Durham, and Leeds (UK). We excluded people who were receiving psychological therapy, were alcohol or drug dependent, were acutely suicidal or had attempted suicide in the previous 2 months, or were cognitively impaired, or who had bipolar disorder or psychosis or psychotic symptoms. We randomly assigned participants (1:1) remotely using computer-generated allocation (minimisation used; stratified by depression severity [Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) score of <19 vs ≥19], antidepressant use, and recruitment site) to BA from junior mental health workers or CBT from psychological therapists. Randomisation done at the Peninsula Clinical Trials Unit was concealed from investigators. Treatment was given open label, but outcome assessors were masked. The primary outcome was depression symptoms according to the PHQ-9 at 12 months. We analysed all those who were randomly allocated and had complete data (modified intention to treat [mITT]) and also all those who were randomly allocated, had complete data, and received at least eight treatment sessions (per protocol [PP]). We analysed safety in the mITT population. The non-inferiority margin was 1·9 PHQ-9 points. This trial is registered with the ISCRTN registry, number ISRCTN27473954. Findings: Between Sept 26, 2012, and April 3, 2014, we randomly allocated 221 (50%) participants to BA and 219 (50%) to CBT. 175 (79%) participants were assessable for the primary outcome in the mITT population in the BA group compared with 189 (86%) in the CBT group, whereas 135 (61%) were assessable in the PP population in the BA group compared with 151 (69%) in the CBT group. BA was non-inferior to CBT (mITT: CBT 8·4 PHQ-9 points [SD 7·5], BA 8·4 PHQ-9 points [7·0], mean difference 0·1 PHQ-9 points [95% CI -1·3 to 1·5], p=0·89; PP: CBT 7·9 PHQ-9 points [7·3]; BA 7·8 [6·5], mean difference 0·0 PHQ-9 points [-1·5 to 1·6], p=0·99). Two (1%) non-trial-related deaths (one [1%] multidrug toxicity in the BA group and one [1%] cancer in the CBT group) and 15 depression-related, but not treatment-related, serious adverse events (three in the BA group and 12 in the CBT group) occurred in three [2%] participants in the BA group (two [1%] patients who overdosed and one [1%] who self-harmed) and eight (4%) participants in the CBT group (seven [4%] who overdosed and one [1%] who self-harmed). Interpretation: We found that BA, a simpler psychological treatment than CBT, can be delivered by junior mental health workers with less intensive and costly training, with no lesser effect than CBT. Effective psychological therapy for depression can be delivered without the need for costly and highly trained professionals. Funding: National Institute for Health Research.

Lancet (London, England) · randomised controlled trial · 354 citationsread the source →

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) versus acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for dementia family caregivers with significant depressive symptoms: Results of a randomized clinical trial.

Objective: The differential efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for dementia family caregivers' is analyzed through a randomized controlled trial. Method: Participants were 135 caregivers with high depressive symptomatology who were randomly allocated to the intervention conditions or a control group (CG). Pre-, postintervention, and follow-up measurements assessed depressive symptomatology, anxiety, leisure, dysfunctional thoughts, and experiential avoidance. Results: Depression: Significant effects of interventions compared with CG were found for CBT (p < .001, d = 0.98, number needed to treat [NNT] = 3.61) and ACT (p < .001, d = 1.17, NNT = 3.53) at postintervention, but were maintained only at follow-up for CBT (p = .02, d = 0.74, NNT = 9.71). Clinically significant change was observed in 26.7% participants in CBT, 24.2% in ACT, and 0% in CG. At follow-up, 10.53% in CBT and 4% in ACT were recovered (0% CG). Anxiety: At postintervention, ACT participants showed lower anxiety than CBT participants (p < .05, d = 0.50) and CG participants (p < .01, d = 0.79, NNT = 3.86), with no effects at follow-up. At postintervention, 23.33% in CBT, 36.36% in ACT, and 6.45% in CG showed clinically significant change. At follow-up, 26.32% in CBT, 36% in ACT, and 13.64% in CG were recovered. Significant changes at postintervention were found in leisure and dysfunctional thoughts in both ACT and CBT, with changes in experiential avoidance only for ACT. Conclusion: Similar results were obtained for ACT and CBT. ACT seems to be a viable and effective treatment for dementia caregivers.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · randomised controlled trial · 142 citationsread the source →

Remdesivir plus standard of care versus standard of care alone for the treatment of patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (DisCoVeRy): a phase 3, randomised, controlled, open-label trial.

Background: The antiviral efficacy of remdesivir against SARS-CoV-2 is still controversial. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of remdesivir plus standard of care compared with standard of care alone in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19, with indication of oxygen or ventilator support. Methods: DisCoVeRy was a phase 3, open-label, adaptive, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial conducted in 48 sites in Europe (France, Belgium, Austria, Portugal, Luxembourg). Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted to hospital with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and illness of any duration were eligible if they had clinical evidence of hypoxaemic pneumonia, or required oxygen supplementation. Exclusion criteria included elevated liver enzymes, severe chronic kidney disease, any contraindication to one of the studied treatments or their use in the 29 days before random assignment, or use of ribavirin, as well as pregnancy or breastfeeding. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive standard of care alone or in combination with remdesivir, lopinavir-ritonavir, lopinavir-ritonavir and interferon beta-1a, or hydroxychloroquine. Randomisation used computer-generated blocks of various sizes; it was stratified on severity of disease at inclusion and on European administrative region. Remdesivir was administered as 200 mg intravenous infusion on day 1, followed by once daily, 1-h infusions of 100 mg up to 9 days, for a total duration of 10 days. It could be stopped after 5 days if the participant was discharged. The primary outcome was the clinical status at day 15 measured by the WHO seven-point ordinal scale, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population and was one of the secondary outcomes. This trial is registered with the European Clinical Trials Database, EudraCT2020-000936-23, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04315948. Findings: Between March 22, 2020, and Jan 21, 2021, 857 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to remdesivir plus standard of care (n=429) or standard of care only (n=428). 15 participants were excluded from analysis in the remdesivir group, and ten in the control group. At day 15, the distribution of the WHO ordinal scale was: (1) not hospitalised, no limitations on activities (61 [15%] of 414 in the remdesivir group vs 73 [17%] of 418 in the control group); (2) not hospitalised, limitation on activities (129 [31%] vs 132 [32%]); (3) hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen (50 [12%] vs 29 [7%]); (4) hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen (76 [18%] vs 67 [16%]); (5) hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices (15 [4%] vs 14 [3%]); (6) hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (62 [15%] vs 79 [19%]); (7) death (21 [5%] vs 24 [6%]). The difference between treatment groups was not significant (odds ratio 0·98 [95% CI 0·77-1·25]; p=0·85). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of serious adverse events between treatment groups (remdesivir, 135 [33%] of 406 vs control, 130 [31%] of 418; p=0·48). Three deaths (acute respiratory distress syndrome, bacterial infection, and hepatorenal syndrome) were considered related to remdesivir by the investigators, but only one by the sponsor's safety team (hepatorenal syndrome). Interpretation: No clinical benefit was observed from the use of remdesivir in patients who were admitted to hospital for COVID-19, were symptomatic for more than 7 days, and required oxygen support. Funding: European Union Commission, French Ministry of Health, Domaine d'intérêt majeur One Health Île-de-France, REACTing, Fonds Erasme-COVID-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Austrian Group Medical Tumor, European Regional Development Fund, Portugal Ministry of Health, Portugal Agency for Clinical Research and Biomedical Innovation. Translation: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

The Lancet. Infectious diseases · randomised controlled trial · 264 citationsread the source →

Long-term effects of the family bereavement program on multiple indicators of grief in parentally bereaved children and adolescents.

Objectives: This article reports on results from a randomized experimental trial of the effects of the Family Bereavement Program (FBP) on multiple measures of grief experienced by parentally bereaved children and adolescents over a 6-year period. Method: Participants were 244 youths (ages 8-16, mean age = 11.4 years) from 156 families that had experienced the death of a parent. The sample consisted of 53% boys and 47% girls; ethnicity was 67% non-Hispanic White and 33% ethnic minority. Families were randomly assigned to the FBP (N = 135) or a literature control condition (N = 109). Two grief measures, the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief and the Intrusive Grief Thoughts Scale (IGTS) were administered at 4 times over 6 years: pretest, posttest, and 11-month and 6-year follow-ups. A 3rd measure, an adaptation of the Inventory of Traumatic Grief (ITG) was administered only at the 6-year follow-up. Results: Compared with the control group, the FBP group showed a greater reduction in their level of problematic grief (IGTS) at posttest and 6-year follow-up and in the percentage at clinical levels of problematic grief at the posttest. The FBP also reduced scores on a dimension of the ITG, Social Detachment/Insecurity, at 6-year follow-up for 3 subgroups: those who experienced lower levels of grief at program entry, older youths, and boys. Conclusion: These are the first findings from a randomized trial with long-term follow-up of the effects of a program to reduce problematic levels of grief of parentally bereaved youths.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · randomised controlled trial · 67 citationsread the source →

Effectiveness of internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome (FITNET): a randomised controlled trial.

Background: Chronic fatigue syndrome is characterised by persistent fatigue and severe disability. Cognitive behavioural therapy seems to be a promising treatment, but its availability is restricted. We developed Fatigue In Teenagers on the interNET (FITNET), the first dedicated internet-based therapeutic program for adolescents with this disorder, and compared its effectiveness with that of usual care. Methods: Adolescents aged 12-18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome were assigned to FITNET or usual care in a 1:1 ratio at one tertiary treatment centre in the Netherlands by use of a computer-generated blocked randomisation allocation schedule. The study was open label. Primary outcomes were school attendance, fatigue severity, and physical functioning, and were assessed at 6 months with computerised questionnaires. Analysis was by intention to treat. Thereafter, all patients were offered FITNET if needed. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN59878666. Findings: 68 of 135 adolescents were assigned to FITNET and 67 to usual care, and 67 and 64, respectively, were analysed. FITNET was significantly more effective than was usual care for all dichotomised primary outcomes at 6 months-full school attendance (50 [75%] vs 10 [16%], relative risk 4·8, 95% CI 2·7-8·9; p<0·0001), absence of severe fatigue (57 [85%] vs 17 [27%], 3·2, 2·1-4·9; p<0·0001), and normal physical functioning (52 [78%] vs 13 [20%], 3·8, 2·3-6·3; p<0·0001). No serious adverse events were reported. Interpretation: FITNET offers a readily accessible and highly effective treatment for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome. The results of this study justify implementation on a broader scale. Funding: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.

Lancet (London, England) · randomised controlled trial · 140 citationsread the source →

Multiple sclerosis and extract of cannabis: results of the MUSEC trial.

Objective: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with chronic symptoms, including muscle stiffness, spasms, pain and insomnia. Here we report the results of the Multiple Sclerosis and Extract of Cannabis (MUSEC) study that aimed to substantiate the patient based findings of previous studies. Patients and methods: Patients with stable MS at 22 UK centres were randomised to oral cannabis extract (CE) (N=144) or placebo (N=135), stratified by centre, walking ability and use of antispastic medication. This double blind, placebo controlled, phase III study had a screening period, a 2 week dose titration phase from 5 mg to a maximum of 25 mg of tetrahydrocannabinol daily and a 10 week maintenance phase. The primary outcome measure was a category rating scale (CRS) measuring patient reported change in muscle stiffness from baseline. Further CRSs assessed body pain, spasms and sleep quality. Three validated MS specific patient reported outcome measures assessed aspects of spasticity, physical and psychological impact, and walking ability. Results: The rate of relief from muscle stiffness after 12 weeks was almost twice as high with CE than with placebo (29.4% vs. 15.7%; OR 2.26; 95% CI 1.24 to 4.13; p=0.004, one sided). Similar results were found after 4 weeks and 8 weeks, and also for all further CRSs. Results from the MS scales supported these findings. Conclusion: The study met its primary objective to demonstrate the superiority of CE over placebo in the treatment of muscle stiffness in MS. This was supported by results for secondary efficacy variables. Adverse events in participants treated with CE were consistent with the known side effects of cannabinoids. No new safety concerns were observed. Trial registration number: NCT00552604.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · randomised controlled trial · 159 citationsread the source →

Gender perspective on quality of life, comparisons between groups 4-5.5 years after unsuccessful or successful IVF treatment.

Objective: To describe and compare quality of life in men and women who had in vitro fertilization (IVF) within the Swedish public health system 4-5.5 years previously, either unsuccessfully and were subsequently living without children, or successfully, having children aged 4-5.5 years. These groups were compared to a control group of men and women with children born at the same time as in the successful group. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Reproductive Unit, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Sample: Twenty-six men and 37 women in the unsuccessful group, 135 men and 154 women in the successful group and 93 men and 118 women in the control group. Methods: Questionnaire study. The respective gender differences were studied in the control and study groups. Main outcome measures: Psychological general well-being (PGWB), sense of coherence (SOC), experience of infertility, demographic-socio-economic, and health characteristics. Results: Men in the unsuccessful IVF group scored lower in total PGWB and SOC indices than the successful group men. They reported more depression, lower PGWB and lower SOC than the control group men. Women in the unsuccessful IVF group reported more anxiety, depression, and lower SOC than the successful group women and more depression and lower SOC indices than control group women. Men and women in the unsuccessful IVF group did not differ in any of the parameters. Men in the successful IVF group had higher PGWB, less signs of depression and more self-confidence than women in that group. Conclusion: Quality of life in men seems more negatively affected by involuntary infertility than reported in earlier studies.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · cohort or longitudinal · 46 citationsread the source →

Development and validation of the Body and Appearance Self-Conscious Emotions Scale (BASES).

The purpose of these studies was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of shame, guilt, authentic pride, and hubristic pride for use in body and appearance contexts. In Study 1, 41 potential items were developed and assessed for item quality and comprehension. In Study 2, a panel of experts (N=8; M=11, SD=6.5 years of experience) reviewed the scale and items for evidence of content validity. Participants in Study 3 (n=135 males, n=300 females) completed the BASES and various body image, personality, and emotion scales. A separate sample (n=155; 35.5% male) in Study 3 completed the BASES twice using a two-week time interval. The BASES subscale scores demonstrated evidence for internal consistency, item-total correlations, concurrent, convergent, incremental, and discriminant validity, and 2-week test-retest reliability. The 4-factor solution was a good fit in confirmatory factor analysis, reflecting body-related shame, guilt, authentic and hubristic pride subscales of the BASES. The development and validation of the BASES may help advance body image and self-conscious emotion research by providing a foundation to examine the unique antecedents and outcomes of these specific emotional experiences.

Body image · cohort or longitudinal · 74 citationsread the source →

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Older Adults: Rapid Review.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed the lives of countless members of the general population. Older adults are known to experience loneliness, age discrimination, and excessive worry. It is therefore reasonable to anticipate that they would experience greater negative outcomes related to the COVID-19 pandemic given their increased isolation and risk for complications than younger adults. Objective: This study aims to synthesize the existing research on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and associated isolation and protective measures, on older adults. The secondary objective is to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and associated isolation and protective measures, on older adults with Alzheimer disease and related dementias. Methods: A rapid review of the published literature was conducted on October 6, 2020, through a search of 6 online databases to synthesize results from published original studies regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults. The Human Development Model conceptual framework-Disability Creation Process was used to describe and understand interactions between personal factors, environmental factors, and life habits. Methods and results are reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement. Results: A total of 135 records were included from the initial search strategy of 13,452 individual studies. Of these, 113 (83.7%) studies were determined to be of level 4 according to the levels of evidence classification by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The presence of psychological symptoms, exacerbation of ageism, and physical deterioration of aged populations were reported in the included studies. Decreased social life and fewer in-person social interactions reported during the COVID-19 pandemic were occasionally associated with reduced quality of life and increased depression. Difficulties accessing services, sleep disturbances, and a reduction of physical activity were also noted. Conclusions: Our results highlight the need for adequate isolation and protective measures. Older adults represent a heterogeneous group, which could explain the contradictory results found in the literature. Individual, organizational, and institutional strategies should be established to ensure that older adults are able to maintain social contacts, preserve family ties, and maintain the ability to give or receive help during the current pandemic. Future studies should focus on specific consequences and needs of more at-risk older adults to ensure their inclusion, both in public health recommendations and considerations made by policy makers.

JMIR aging · review · 233 citationsread the source →

Essential Hypertension

HomeCirculationVol. 101, No. 3Essential Hypertension Free AccessOtherPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyRedditDiggEmail Jump toFree AccessOtherPDF/EPUBEssential Hypertension Part I: Definition and Etiology Oscar A. Carretero and Suzanne Oparil Oscar A. CarreteroOscar A. Carretero From the Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich (O.A.C.), and the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham (S.O.). and Suzanne OparilSuzanne Oparil From the Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich (O.A.C.), and the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham (S.O.). Originally published25 Jan 2000https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.3.329Circulation. 2000;101:329–335Essential hypertension remains a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) despite important advances in our understanding of its pathophysiology and the availability of effective treatment strategies. High blood pressure (BP) increases the risk of CVD for millions of people worldwide, and there is evidence that the problem is only getting worse. In the past decade, age-adjusted rates of stroke incidence have risen, and the slope of the age-adjusted rate of decline in coronary disease has leveled off. The incidence of end-stage renal disease and the prevalence of heart failure have also increased. A major contributor to these trends is inadequate control of BP in the hypertensive population. This review of current concepts regarding the definition, etiology, and treatment of essential hypertension is intended to aid the clinician in identifying those individuals at high risk who need to undergo evaluation and treatment, as well as in selecting optimal treatment strategies for hypertensive patients with comorbid conditions and/or target organ damage. The part of the review that deals with the genetic basis of hypertension and the gene/environment interaction that may lead to elevated BP is still a work in progress. Information gained from the Human Genome Project and from ongoing studies of the genetic basis of hypertension both in animal models and human populations may revolutionize the treatment of hypertension by replacing current empirical therapy with more effective, targeted treatments based on the genotype of the patient. Concepts introduced in this review form the basis for such "pharmacogenomic" approaches to antihypertensive therapy. Definition of Essential or Primary HypertensionBP is a quantitative trait that is highly variable1 ; in population studies, BP has a normal distribution that is slightly skewed to the right. There is a strong positive and continuous correlation between BP and the risk of CVD (stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure), renal disease, and mortality, even in the normotensive range. This correlation is more robust with systolic than with diastolic BP.2 There is no specific level of BP where cardiovascular and renal complications start to occur; thus the definition of hypertension is arbitrary but needed for practical reasons in patient assessment and treatment. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) defined and classified hypertension in adults, as shown in Table 1.3 The diagnosis of hypertension is made when the average of 2 or more diastolic BP measurements on at least 2 subsequent visits is ≥90 mm Hg or when the average of multiple systolic BP readings on 2 or more subsequent visits is consistently ≥140 mm Hg. Isolated systolic hypertension is defined as systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg. Individuals with high normal BP tend to maintain pressures that are above average for the general population and are at greater risk for development of definite hypertension and cardiovascular events than the general population. With the use of these definitions, it is estimated that 43 million people in the United States have hypertension or are taking antihypertensive medication, which is ≈24% of the adult population. This proportion changes with (1) race, being higher in blacks (32.4%) and lower in whites (23.3%) and Mexican Americans (22.6%); (2) age, because in industrialized countries systolic BP rises throughout life, whereas diastolic BP rises until age 55 to 60 years and thus the greater increase in prevalence of hypertension among the elderly is mainly due to systolic hypertension; (3) geographic patterns, because hypertension is more prevalent in the southeastern United States; (4) gender, because hypertension is more prevalent in men (though menopause tends to abolish this difference); and (5) socioeconomic status, which is an indicator of lifestyle attributes and is inversely related to the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality rates of hypertension. Essential, primary, or idiopathic hypertension is defined as high BP in which secondary causes such as renovascular disease, renal failure, pheochromocytoma, aldosteronism, or other causes of secondary hypertension or mendelian forms (monogenic) are not present. Essential hypertension accounts for 95% of all cases of hypertension. Essential hypertension is a heterogeneous disorder, with different patients having different causal factors that lead to high BP. Essential hypertension needs to be separated into various syndromes because the causes of high BP in most patients presently classified as having essential hypertension can be recognized. Known Etiological Factors in Essential HypertensionAlthough it has frequently been indicated that the causes of essential hypertension are not known, this is only partially true because we have little information on genetic variations or genes that are overexpressed or underexpressed as well as the intermediary phenotypes that they regulate to cause high BP.4 A number of factors increase BP, including (1) obesity, (2) insulin resistance, (3) high alcohol intake, (4) high salt intake (in salt-sensitive patients), (5) aging and perhaps (6) sedentary lifestyle, (7) stress, (8) low potassium intake, and (9) low calcium intake.56 Furthermore, many of these factors are additive, such as obesity and alcohol intake. In this review, variations in BP that are genetically determined will be called "inherited BP," although we do not know which genes cause BP to vary; we know from family studies that inherited BP can range from low normal BP to severe hypertension. Factors that increase BP, such as obesity and high alcohol and salt intake, will be called "hyperten-sinogenic factors." Some of these factors have inherited, behavioral, and environmental components. Inherited BP could be considered core BP, whereas hypertensinogenic factors cause BP to increase above the range of inherited BPs, thus creating 4 main possibilities: (1) patients who have inherited BP in the optimal category (<120/<80 mm Hg); if 1 or more hypertensinogenic factors are added, BP would probably increase but remain in the normal range (<135/<85 mm Hg) (Figure 1, first 2 columns); (2) patients who have inherited BP in the normal category (≤130/≤85 mm Hg); if 1 or more hypertensinogenic factors are added, BP will probably increase to the high normal range (130 to 139/85 to 89 mm Hg) or to stage 1 of the hypertensive category (140 to 159/90 to 99 mm Hg) (Figure 1, second 2 columns); (3) patients who have inherited BP in the high normal category (130 to 139/85 to 89 mm Hg); if 1 or more hypertensinogenic factors are added, BP will increase to the hypertensive range (≥140/≥90 mm Hg) (Figure 1, third 2 columns); and (4) patients who have inherited BP in the hypertensive range; addition of 1 or more hypertensinogenic factors will make hypertension more severe, changing it from stage 1 to stage 2 or 3 (Figure 1, fourth to sixth 2 columns).Theoretically, in a population unaffected by hypertensinogenic factors, BP will have a normal distribution; it will be skewed to the right and will have a narrow base or less variance (Figure 2, continuous line). When 1 hypertensinogenic factor is added to this population, such as increased body mass, one would expect the normal distribution curve to be further skewed to the right; consequently the base will be wider (more variance) and the curve will be flatter (Figure 2, broken line). If a second hypertensinogenic factor such as alcohol intake is added to increased body mass, the curve will be skewed more to the right and the variance will increase further, with more subjects classified as hypertensive (Figure 2, dotted line).Discovering which genetic variations place BP on the left or right side of the distribution curve is of both theoretical and practical importance because it could help the physician to better treat or cure hypertension.7 Recognition of the hypertensinogenic factors may allow nonpharmacological prevention, treatment, or cure of hypertension. Hypertensinogenic factors such as obesity, insulin resistance, or high alcohol intake also have an important genetic component. Furthermore, there are interactions between genetic and environmental factors (Figure 2) that influence intermediary phenotypes such as sympathetic nerve activity, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and renal kallikrein-kinin systems, and endothelial factors, which in turn influence other intermediary phenotypes such as sodium excretion, vascular reactivity, and cardiac contractility. These and many other intermediary phenotypes determine total vascular resistance and cardiac output and, consequently, BP. Recognition of the hypertensinogenic factor(s) and establishing that the patient's hypertension is the result of obesity (either alone or combined with other factors such as insulin resistance or high alcohol intake) or old age instead of essential hypertension may help the physician as well as the patient and his or her family to modify or eliminate these hypertensinogenic and CVD risk factors when possible, which may cure the hypertension or at least facilitate control of BP. When the hypertensinogenic factor cannot be reduced or eliminated, as with systolic hypertension induced by aging (arteriosclerosis), recognition of the underlying cause of high BP will emphasize the need for (1) further studies to determine whether the patient has arteriosclerosis and/or atherosclerosis, the magnitude of the disease, and whether there are occlusive lesions; (2) treatment of the atherosclerosis with lifestyle and dietary changes and lipid-lowering agents if necessary; and (3) pharmacological treatment of systolic hypertension to decrease passive stiffness (arteriosclerosis) of the major central elastic arteries and decrease morbidity and mortality rates. Thus recognition of factors that induce hypertension is not only of theoretical but also of practical importance. In conclusion, as stated by Beilin,8 "it is no longer appropriate to define essential hypertension as a rise in blood pressure without cause," since a number of causes can be clearly identified in most cases of so-called "essential hypertension." As discussed later in more detail, there is clear evidence that changes in lifestyle, including dietary changes that reduce body weight, fat, and alcohol intake and increase potassium and calcium intake,9 as well as exercise,1011 reduce or normalize BP in many patients. Inherited BPThe identification of variant (allelic) genes that contribute to the development of hypertension is complicated by the fact that the 2 phenotypes that determine BP, cardiac output and total peripheral resistance, are controlled by intermediary phenotypes, including the autonomic nervous system, vasopressor/vasodepressor hormones, the structure of the cardiovascular system, body fluid volume and renal function, and many others. Furthermore, these intermediary phenotypes are also controlled by complex mechanisms including BP itself.12 Thus there are many genes that could participate in the development of hypertension. The influence of genes on BP has been suggested by family studies demonstrating associations of BP among siblings and between parents and children. There is a better association among BP values in biological children than in adopted children and in identical as opposed to nonidentical twins. BP variability attributed to all genetic factors varies from 25% in pedigree studies to 65% in twin studies. Furthermore, genetic factors also influence behavioral patterns, which might lead to BP elevation. For example, a tendency toward obesity or alcoholism will be influenced by both genetic and environmental factors; thus the proportion of BP variability caused by inheritance is difficult to determine and may vary in different populations. Mutations in at least 10 genes have been shown to raise or lower BP through a common pathway by increasing or decreasing salt and water reabsorption by the nephron.1314 The genetic mutations responsible for 3 rare forms of mendelian (monogenic) hypertensive syndromes−glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism (GRA), Liddle's syndrome, and apparent mineralocorticoid excess−have been identified, whereas in a fourth, autosomal dominant hypertension with brachydactyly, the gene is not yet identified but has been mapped to chromosome 12 (12p). Subtle variations in one of these genes may also cause some forms of "essential" hypertension. For a review of the mutations that cause a decrease in BP, see Lifton.13Glucocorticoid-Remediable AldosteronismThis is an autosomal dominant form of monogenic hypertension in which aldosterone secretion is regulated by adrenocorticotropic hormone. Glucocorticoid treatment causes BP to decrease and gives the syndrome its name. The genetic mutation that causes GRA has been identified by Lifton14 as a chimeric gene fusing nucleotide sequences of the promoter-regulatory region of 11β-hydroxylase (controlled by adrenocorticotropic hormone) and the structural portion of the aldosterone synthase gene. The chimeric gene results from a meiotic mismatch and unequal crossing over. The patients are usually thought to have primary aldosteronism because they exhibit volume expansion, metabolic alkalosis with hypokalemia, low plasma renin, and high aldosterone. Most of the patients first described as having GRA showed severe hypertension and died prematurely from stroke. However, with the development of direct genetic testing, the BP of patients with this syndrome was found to cover a wide range, including normotensive levels.1516 In patients with GRA and normal BP, expression of the chimeric gene may be variable, but because steroid levels are similar in patients with severe and mild hypertension, this seems unlikely. It is also possible that the genetic background of the trait (other than the chimeric mutation), such as high renal kallikrein, places the inherited BP of these subjects in the low or ideal normal range and the mutation causes BP to increase to high normal or hypertensive stage 1. Thus the final BP would be the combined result of the inherited BP (including the genetic mutation) and the increase in BP caused by hypertensinogenic factors such as salt. Liddle's SyndromeThis is an autosomal dominant form of monogenic hypertension that results from mutations in the amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channel, leading to increased channel activity.17 The mutations reported to date result in the elimination of 45 to 75 amino acids from the cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus of β- or γ-subunits of the channel; thus Liddle's syndrome is genetically heterogeneous. It is characterized by the early onset of hypertension with hypokalemia and suppression of both plasma renin activity and aldosterone, the latter differentiating this syndrome from primary aldosteronism. Both the hypertension and the hypokalemia vary in severity, raising the possibility that some patients classified as having salt-sensitive essential hypertension actually have Liddle's syndrome.18 It is also possible that high BP in blacks, who are frequently salt-sensitive, is due to a polymorphism in one of the sodium channel genes or in one of the genes of systems that regulate it, causing its activity to increase. Apparent Mineralocorticoid ExcessThis is an autosomal recessive form of monogenic juvenile hypertension that results from a mutation in the renal-specific isoform 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene.19 Normally this enzyme converts cortisol to the inactive metabolite cortisone. In the distal nephron this is important because cortisol and aldosterone have a similar affinity for the mineralocorticoid receptor. The enzymatic deficiency allows the mineralocorticoid receptors in the nephron to be occupied and activated by cortisol, causing sodium and water retention, volume expansion, low renin, low aldosterone, and more importantly, a salt-sensitive form of hypertension. Thus this gene may be a locus for salt-sensitive essential hypertension. Autosomal Dominant Hypertension With BrachydactylyIn this monogenic syndrome, hypertension and brachydactyly are always inherited together (100% cosegregation).4 Affected persons are shorter than nonaffected relatives. The gene for hypertension has been mapped to the short arm of chromosome 12 (12p) in a large Turkish kindred. Two other families with this syndrome have been reported, 1 in Canada and 1 in the United States. In addition, the study of a Japanese child with hypertension and type E brachydactyly has allowed the area on 12p containing the gene mutation to be pinpointed further, although the gene responsible for this syndrome has not yet been cloned. Unlike the other 3 autosomal forms of hypertension, BP is not affected by volume expansion and the underlying mechanism is not known. Thus identification of the gene responsible may help clarify some of the genetic alterations in essential hypertension. Essential or Primary HypertensionThe genetic alterations responsible for inherited "essential" hypertension remain largely unknown.4 Results from family studies suggest several possible intermediary phenotypes (genetic traits) that may be related to inherited high BP, such as high sodium-lithium countertransport, low urinary kallikrein excretion, high fasting plasma insulin concentrations, high-density LDL subfractions, fat pattern index, and body mass index (BMI).12 Jeunemaitre et al2021 first reported a polymorphism in the angiotensinogen gene linked with essential hypertension in hypertensive siblings from Utah and France. This polymorphism consists of a substitution of thymidine for cytosine in nucleotide 704, which causes substitution of methionine for threonine at position 235 (M235T) and is associated with increased concentrations of plasma angiotensinogen. This variant appears to be in tight linkage disequilibrium with a promoter mutation in which adenine replaces guanine (-6A) upstream from the initiation side of transcription.22 Tests of promoter activity suggest that this nucleotide substitution increases the rate of gene transcription, which may explain the higher angiotensinogen concentration found in subjects with the variant M235T.22 Many studies have been published on various racial groups with regard to the association between allelic variations in angiotensinogen and hypertension.23 However, these variations explain only a small part of the BP variation (≈6%). Furthermore, plasma angiotensinogen concentrations, though higher in patients with the polymorphism, clearly overlap with normotensive patients. Polymorphisms and mutations in other genes such as angiotensin-converting enzyme, β2-adrenergic receptor, α-adducin, angiotensinase C, renin-binding protein, G-protein β3-subunit, atrial natriuretic factor, and the insulin receptor have also been linked to the development of essential hypertension; however, most of them show a weak association if any, and most of these studies need further confirmation. Thus these gene alterations will not be discussed here because they go beyond the scope of this review (see Luft4 ).Hypertensinogenic FactorsThere is evidence that obesity, insulin resistance, high alcohol intake, high salt intake, a sedentary lifestyle, stress, dyslipidemia, and low potassium or calcium intake increase BP in susceptible subjects. Here we will briefly discuss obesity and insulin resistance; other hypertensinogenic factors will be discussed in the section "Lifestyle Modification."Obesity and Insulin ResistanceObesity, and obesity, is the main hypertensinogenic It was estimated in the study that is associated with a mm Hg increase in systolic is also the cause of insulin resistance, left and Thus obesity is an important cardiovascular its incidence and prevalence are in most industrialized and in the United States has The between BP and body fat is not to the but is continuous throughout the range of body A direct association between hypertension and in by the in has been in and population studies from early to old A of is considered normal or whereas a of to with increases the risk of high BP by and the risk of insulin resistance by Thus insulin resistance is in many patients with obesity and hypertension. The mechanism by which obesity BP is not but increased is associated with an increase in plasma volume and cardiac both these alterations and BP can be by in both normotensive and hypertensive even when sodium intake is BP in is and fasting insulin is the of this In these BP by 10 mm Hg changing from 2 on a to a When some of these subjects by BP by 10 mm Hg and salt was no longer present. The that sodium fasting plasma plasma aldosterone, and plasma the that BP is to dietary sodium and that this may be due to the combined of and increased activity of the sympathetic nervous It is not clear whether body fat by is a factor because in for 1 3 BP, and this decrease was mainly in those who high fasting insulin and insulin levels in to In this study was not a factor because the subjects on a and actually gained an average of the which that plasma insulin by a different mechanism than of body These studies can be as that high plasma insulin causes salt and that decreasing insulin resistance by or BP. Furthermore, hypertensive subjects are more to exhibit insulin resistance than normotensive the other insulin by has a In subjects with hypertension there is resistance to the of insulin on However, in addition to this metabolic insulin increases both sympathetic nerve activity and sodium and water retention, and it could be that the hypertension is due to the of resistance to these secondary of factor and a that have also been in the of hypertension. although the mechanisms by which obesity and insulin resistance increase BP remain it is clear that these increases in BP are on the inherited of of the evaluation are to determine the and of target organ and for specific causes of hypertension hypertensinogenic factors and other CVD risk factors; and the patient to facilitate the of therapy and define and of BP by the is the most important part of the evaluation and of the patient and be in a 2) with the use of and A is a or a to an arm Two or 3 measurements be at and at least 2 be allowed between The diastolic is at the level when of BP by patients or family and/or BP the diagnosis and the of hypertension. BP values the are lower and better with target organ than BP measurements by of BP has several including hypertension from hypertension that only in the the to antihypertensive to treatment by the patient a in his or her and by the need for BP or of BP is for many patients with high BP, those who to be to antihypertensive A of or BP measurements is that and BP be and that and in to BP be and be and a in all patients The assessment the described in Table It help to known, causes of high the or of target organ and and other CVD or comorbid conditions that might or Tests and only blood blood fasting total and high-density or and a indicated in patients for the diagnosis of secondary hypertension and/or comorbid conditions urinary protein, of fasting and plasma renin is Part of a Part of this will be published in the 1, of 1. of hypertensinogenic factors such as obesity and alcohol intake on systolic and diastolic BP the stage of inherited BP to without the of the hypertensinogenic with normal or high normal inherited BP hypertensive stage 1 when BP is increased by a hypertensinogenic In patients with inherited hypertension in 1 to hypertension more severe when hypertensinogenic factors are among genetic and environmental factors in the development of hypertension. side of environmental factors and multiple genes responsible for high BP and intermediary The result of these intermediary phenotypes is blood pressure with a normal distribution skewed to the right. the theoretical BP of the population that is not affected by hypertensinogenic factors; area systolic BP in the hypertensive range. and dotted populations in which 1 or 2 hypertensinogenic factors high alcohol intake) have been that in these 2 populations the distribution are to the right and the number of hypertensive individuals is increased when hypertensinogenic factors are Table 1. and of Blood Pressure mm mm 1 2 3 systolic a patient's systolic and

Circulation · review · 1085 citationsread the source →

How Do Corticosteroids Work in Asthma?

Reviews2 September 2003How Do Corticosteroids Work in Asthma?Peter J. Barnes, DM, DSc and Ian M. Adcock, PhDPeter J. Barnes, DM, DScFrom National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom. Search for more papers by this author and Ian M. Adcock, PhDFrom National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom. Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-139-5_Part_1-200309020-00012 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Clinical PrinciplesAsthma is the most common chronic disease in westernized countries. Patients with asthma have an underlying chronic inflammation of the airways characterized by activated mast cells, eosinophils, and T-helper 2 lymphocytes. This results in increased responsiveness of the airways to such triggers as exercise, allergens, and air pollutants. This chronic inflammation underlies the typical symptoms of asthma, which include intermittent wheezing, coughing, shortness of breath, and chest tightness. Corticosteroids are the most effective treatment for asthma, and inhaled corticosteroids have become first-line treatment for children and adults with persistent symptoms. Corticosteroids suppress the chronic airway inflammation in patients with asthma, and the molecular ...References1. Busse WW, Lemanske RF. Asthma. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:350-62. [PMID: 11172168] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Barnes PJ, Chung KF, Page CP. Inflammatory mediators of asthma: an update. Pharmacol Rev. 1998;50:515-96. [PMID: 9860804] MedlineGoogle Scholar3. Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Transcription factors and asthma. Eur Respir J. 1998;12:221-34. [PMID: 9701442] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Hart LA, Krishnan VL, Adcock IM, Barnes PJ, Chung KF. Activation and localization of transcription factor, nuclear factor-B, in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:1585-92. [PMID: 9817712] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Barnes PJ, Karin M. Nuclear factor-B: a pivotal transcription factor in chronic inflammatory diseases. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1066-71. [PMID: 9091804] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Donovan CE, Mark DA, He HZ, Liou HC, Kobzik L, Wang Y, . NF-kappa B/Rel transcription factors: c-Rel promotes airway hyperresponsiveness and allergic pulmonary inflammation. J Immunol. 1999;163:6827-33. [PMID: 10586083] MedlineGoogle Scholar7. Ogryzko VV, Schiltz RL, Russanova V, Howard BH, Nakatani Y. The transcriptional coactivators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell. 1996;87:953-9. [PMID: 8945521] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Roth SY, Denu JM, Allis CD. Histone acetyltransferases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:81-120. [PMID: 11395403] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Ito K, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Glucocorticoid receptor recruitment of histone deacetylase 2 inhibits interleukin-1-induced histone H4 acetylation on lysines 8 and 12. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:6891-903. [PMID: 10958685] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Gao L, Cueto MA, Asselbergs F, Atadja P. Cloning and functional characterization of HDAC11, a novel member of the human histone deacetylase family. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:25748-55. [PMID: 11948178] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11. Ito K, Caramori G, Lim S, Oates T, Chung KF, Barnes PJ, . Expression and activity of histone deacetylases in human asthmatic airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:392-6. [PMID: 12153977] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12. Barnes PJ. Anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids: molecular mechanisms [Editorial]. Clin Sci (Lond). 1998;94:557-72. [PMID: 9854452] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13. Barnes PJ. Molecular mechanisms of corticosteroids in allergic diseases. Allergy. 2001;56:928-36. [PMID: 11576070] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14. Schwiebert LM, Stellato C, Schleimer RP. The epithelium as a target of glucocorticoid action in the treatment of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996; 154:S16-9; discussion S19-20. [PMID: 8756782] Google Scholar15. Herrscher RF, Kasper C, Sullivan TJ. Endogenous cortisol regulates immunoglobulin E-dependent late phase reactions. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:596-603. [PMID: 1644926] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar16. Barnes PJ. Therapeutic strategies for allergic diseases. Nature. 1999;402:B31-8. [PMID: 10586893] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar17. Yudt MR, Cidlowski JA. The glucocorticoid receptor: coding a diversity of proteins and responses through a single gene. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16:1719-26. [PMID: 12145329] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar18. Leung DY, Hamid Q, Vottero A, Szefler SJ, Surs W, Minshall E, . Association of glucocorticoid insensitivity with increased expression of glucocorticoid receptor . J Exp Med. 1997;186:1567-74. [PMID: 9348314] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar19. Hecht K, Carlstedt-Duke J, Stierna P, Gustaffson J, Bronnegard M, Wilkstrom AC. Evidence that the -isoform of the human glucocorticoid receptor does not act as a physiologically significant repressor. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:26659-64. [PMID: 9334248] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar20. Bodwell JE, Webster JC, Jewell CM, Cidlowski JA, Hu JM, Munck A. Glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation: overview, function and cell cycle-dependence. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1998;65:91-9. [PMID: 9699861] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar21. Reichardt HM, Kaestner KH, Tuckermann J, Kretz O, Wessely O, Bock R, . DNA binding of the glucocorticoid receptor is not essential for survival. Cell. 1998;93:531-41. [PMID: 9604929] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar22. Ito K, Jazrawi E, Cosio B, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. p65-activated histone acetyltransferase activity is repressed by glucocorticoids: mifepristone fails to recruit HDAC2 to the p65-HAT complex. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:30208-15. [PMID: 11395507] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar23. Yao TP, Ku G, Zhou N, Scully R, Livingston DM. The nuclear hormone receptor coactivator SRC-1 is a specific target of p300. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:10626-31. [PMID: 8855229] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar24. Kurihara I, Shibata H, Suzuki T, Ando T, Kobayashi S, Hayashi M, . Expression and regulation of nuclear receptor coactivators in glucocorticoid action. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002;189:181-9. [PMID: 12039076] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar25. Hall SE, Lim S, Witherden IR, Tetley TD, Barnes PJ, Kamal AM, . Lung type II cell and macrophage annexin I release: differential effects of two glucocorticoids. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:L114-21. [PMID: 9887063] MedlineGoogle Scholar26. Newton R, Hart LA, Stevens DA, Bergmann M, Donnelly LE, Adcock IM, . Effect of dexamethasone on interleukin-1beta-(IL-1)-induced nuclear factor-B (NF-B) and B-dependent transcription in epithelial cells. Eur J Biochem. 1998;254:81-9. [PMID: 9652398] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar27. Heck S, Bender K, Kullmann M, Gottlicher M, Herrlich P, Cato AC. IB-independent downregulation of NF-B activity by glucocorticoid receptor. EMBO J. 1997;16:4698-707. [PMID: 9303314] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar28. Reichardt HM, Tuckermann JP, Gottlicher M, Vujic M, Weih F, Angel P, . Repression of inflammatory responses in the absence of DNA binding by the glucocorticoid receptor. EMBO J. 2001;20:7168-73. [PMID: 11742993] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar29. Hart L, Lim S, Adcock I, Barnes PJ, Chung KF. Effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy on expression and DNA-binding activity of nuclear factor B in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:224-31. [PMID: 10619824] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar30. Imhof A, Wolffe AP. Transcription: gene control by targeted histone acetylation. Curr Biol. 1998;8:R422-4. [PMID: 9637914] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar31. Peterson CL. HDAC's at work: everyone doing their part. Mol Cell. 2002;9:921-2. [PMID: 12049726] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar32. Berger SL. An embarrassment of niches: the many covalent modifications of histones in transcriptional regulation. Oncogene. 2001;20:3007-13. [PMID: 11420715] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar33. Bannister AJ, Schneider R, Kouzarides T. Histone methylation: dynamic or static? Cell. 2002;109:801-6. [PMID: 12110177] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar34. Kagoshima M, Wilcke T, Ito K, Tsaprouni L, Barnes PJ, Punchard N, . Glucocorticoid-mediated transrepression is regulated by histone acetylation and DNA methylation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;429:327-34. [PMID: 11698053] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar35. Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;293:1074-80. [PMID: 11498575] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar36. Bergmann M, Barnes PJ, Newton R. Molecular regulation of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in human lung epithelial cells by interleukin (IL)-1, IL-4, and IL-13 involves both transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2000;22:582-9. [PMID: 10783130] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar37. Caelles C, Gonzalez-Sancho JM, Munoz A. Nuclear hormone receptor antagonism with AP-1 by inhibition of the JNK pathway. Genes Dev. 1997;11:3351-64. [PMID: 9407028] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar38. Vanden Berghe W, Vermeulen L, De Wilde G, De Bosscher K, Boone E, Haegeman G. Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor and gene regulation of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;60:1185-95. [PMID: 11007957] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar39. Lasa M, Brook M, Saklatvala J, Clark AR. Dexamethasone destabilizes cyclooxygenase 2 mRNA by inhibiting mitogen-activated protein kinase p38. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:771-80. [PMID: 11154265] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar40. Lasa M, Abraham SM, Boucheron C, Saklatvala J, Clark AR. Dexamethasone causes sustained expression of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase 1 and phosphatase-mediated inhibition of MAPK p38. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:7802-11. [PMID: 12391149] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar41. Barnes PJ. Scientific rationale for inhaled combination therapy with long-acting 2-agonists and corticosteroids. Eur Respir J. 2002;19:182-91. [PMID: 11843317] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar42. Adcock IM, Stevens DA, Barnes PJ. Interactions of glucocorticoids and 2-agonists. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:160-8. [PMID: 8834349] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar43. Mak JC, Nishikawa M, Shirasaki H, Miyayasu K, Barnes PJ. Protective effects of a glucocorticoid on downregulation of pulmonary 2-adrenergic receptors in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:99-106. [PMID: 7615841] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar44. Mak JC, Hisada T, Salmon M, Barnes PJ, Chung KF. Glucocorticoids reverse IL-1-induced impairment of -adrenoceptor-mediated relaxation and up-regulation of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;135:987-96. [PMID: 11861327] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar45. Eickelberg O, Roth M, Lorx R, Bruce V, Rudiger J, Johnson M, . Ligand-independent activation of the glucocorticoid receptor by 2-adrenergic receptor agonists in primary human lung fibroblasts and vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:1005-10. [PMID: 9873044] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar46. Pang L, Knox AJ. Regulation of TNF--induced eotaxin release from cultured human airway smooth muscle cells by 2-agonists and corticosteroids. FASEB J. 2001;15:261-269. [PMID: 11149914] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar47. Korn SH, Wouters EF, Wesseling G, Arends JW, Thunnissen FB. Interaction between glucocorticoids and 2-agonists: and glucocorticoid-receptor mRNA expression in human bronchial epithelial cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998;56:1561-9. [PMID: 9973176] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar48. Usmani OS, Maneechotesuwan K, Adcock IM, Barnes PJ. Glucocorticoid receptor activation following inhaled fluticasone and salmeterol [Abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:A616. Google Scholar49. Barnes PJ. Theophylline: new perspectives for an old drug. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:813-8. [PMID: 12623857] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar50. Ito K, Lim S, Caramori G, Cosio B, Chung KF, Adcock IM, . A molecular mechanism of action of theophylline: Induction of histone deacetylase activity to decrease inflammatory gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8921-6. [PMID: 12070353] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar51. Evans DJ, Taylor DA, Zetterstrom O, Chung KF, O'Connor BJ, Barnes PJ. A comparison of low-dose inhaled budesonide plus theophylline and high-dose inhaled budesonide for moderate asthma. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1412-8. [PMID: 9358138] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar52. Ukena D, Harnest U, Sakalauskas R, Magyar P, Vetter N, Steffen H, . Comparison of addition of theophylline to inhaled steroid with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroid in asthma. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:2754-60. [PMID: 9493656] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar53. Lim S, Jatakanon A, Gordon D, Macdonald C, Chung KF, Barnes PJ. Comparison of high dose inhaled steroids, low dose inhaled steroids plus low dose theophylline, and low dose inhaled steroids alone in chronic asthma in general practice. Thorax. 2000;55:837-41. [PMID: 10992535] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar54. Szefler SJ, Leung DY. Glucocorticoid-resistant asthma: pathogenesis and clinical implications for management. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:1640-7. [PMID: 9230260] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar55. Barnes PJ. Steroid-resistant asthma. Eur Resp Rev. 2000;10:74-8. Google Scholar56. Spahn JD, Szefler SJ, Surs W, Doherty DE, Nimmagadda SR, Leung DY. A novel action of IL-13: induction of diminished monocyte glucocorticoid receptor-binding affinity. J Immunol. 1996;157:2654-9. [PMID: 8805670] MedlineGoogle Scholar57. Irusen E, Matthews JG, Takahashi A, Barnes PJ, Chung KF, Adcock IM. p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase-induced glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation reduces its activity: role in steroid-insensitive asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109:649-57. [PMID: 11941315] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar58. Hamid QA, Wenzel SE, Hauk PJ, Tsicopoulos A, Wallaert B, Lafitte JJ, . Increased glucocorticoid receptor in airway cells of glucocorticoid-insensitive asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:1600-4. [PMID: 10228133] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar59. Gagliardo R, Chanez P, Vignola AM, Bousquet J, Vachier I, Godard P, . Glucocorticoid receptor and in glucocorticoid dependent asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:7-13. [PMID: 10903212] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar60. Corrigan CJ, Brown PH, Barnes NC, Szefler SJ, Tsai JJ, Frew AJ, . Glucocorticoid resistance in chronic asthma. Glucocorticoid pharmacokinetics, glucocorticoid receptor characteristics, and inhibition of peripheral blood T cell proliferation by glucocorticoids in vitro. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:1016-25. [PMID: 1952426] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar61. Adcock IM, Lane SJ, Brown CR, Lee TH, Barnes PJ. Abnormal glucocorticoid receptor-activator protein 1 interaction in steroid-resistant asthma. J Exp Med. 1995;182:1951-8. [PMID: 7500041] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar62. Matthews JG, Ito K, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Corticosteroid-resistant and corticosteroid-dependent asthma: two clinical phenotypes can be associated with the same in vitro defects in nuclear translocation and acetylation of histone 4 [Abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:A189. Google Scholar63. Keatings VM, Jatakanon A, Worsdell YM, Barnes PJ. Effects of inhaled and oral glucocorticoids on inflammatory indices in asthma and COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:542-8. [PMID: 9032192] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar64. Culpitt SV, Maziak W, Loukidis S, Nightingale JA, Matthews JL, Barnes PJ. Effect of high dose inhaled steroid on cells, cytokines, and proteases in induced sputum in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:1635-9. [PMID: 10556133] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar65. Nightingale JA, Rogers DF, Fan Chung K, Barnes PJ. No effect of inhaled budesonide on the response to inhaled ozone in normal subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:479-86. [PMID: 10673189] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar66. Culpitt SV, Rogers DF, Shah P, De Matos C, Russell RE, Donnelly LE, . Impaired inhibition by dexamethasone of cytokine release by alveolar macrophages from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:24-31. [PMID: 12406856] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar67. Ito K, Lim S, Caramori G, Chung KF, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Cigarette smoking reduces histone deacetylase 2 expression, enhances cytokine expression, and inhibits glucocorticoid actions in alveolar macrophages. FASEB J. 2001;15:1110-2. [PMID: 11292684] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar68. Ito K, Watanabe S, Kharitonov S, Hanazawa T, Adcock IM, Barnes PJ. Histone deacetylase activity and gene expression in COPD patients [Abstract]. Eur Respir J. 2001;18:316S. MedlineGoogle Scholar69. Montuschi P, Collins JV, Ciabattoni G, Lazzeri N, Corradi M, Kharitonov SA, . Exhaled 8-isoprostane as an in vivo biomarker of lung oxidative stress in patients with COPD and healthy smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1175-7. [PMID: 10988150] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar70. Barnes PJ, Pedersen S, Busse WW. Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids. New developments. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:S1-53. [PMID: 9520807] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar71. Heck S, Kullmann M, Gast A, Ponta H, Rahmsdorf HJ, Herrlich P, . A distinct modulating domain in glucocorticoid receptor monomers in the repression of activity of the transcription factor AP-1. EMBO J. 1994;13:4087-95. [PMID: 8076604] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar72. Adcock IM, Nasuhara Y, Stevens DA, Barnes PJ. Ligand-induced differentiation of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) trans-repression and transactivation: preferential targetting of NF-B and lack of I-B involvement. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;127:1003-11. [PMID: 10433509] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar73. Vayssiere BM, Dupont S, Choquart A, Petit F, Garcia T, Marchandeau C, . Synthetic glucocorticoids that dissociate transactivation and AP-1 transrepression exhibit antiinflammatory activity in vivo. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;11:1245-55. [PMID: 9259316] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar74. Belvisi MG, Wicks SL, Battram CH, Bottoms SE, Redford JE, Woodman P, . Therapeutic benefit of a dissociated glucocorticoid and the relevance of in vitro separation of transrepression from transactivation activity. J Immunol. 2001;166:1975-82. [PMID: 11160246] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar75. Bledsoe RK, Montana VG, Stanley TB, Delves CJ, Apolito CJ, McKee DD, . Crystal structure of the glucocorticoid receptor ligand binding domain reveals a novel mode of receptor dimerization and coactivator recognition. Cell. 2002;110:93-105. [PMID: 12151000] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar76. Barnes PJ. New treatments for COPD. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002;1:437-46. [PMID: 12119745] CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar77. Ito K, Lim S, Chung KF, Barnes PJ, Adcock IM. Theophylline enhances histone deacetylase activity and restores glucocorticoid function during oxidative stress [Abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:A625. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: From National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom. Disclosures:Grants received: P.J. Barnes, I.M. Adcock (GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca); Grants pending: P.J. Barnes, I.M. Adcock (GlaxoSmithKline and AstraZeneca).Corresponding Author: P.J. Barnes, DM, DSc, Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, United Kingdom; e-mail, p.j.[email protected]ac.uk. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited ByNanotechnology based advanced therapeutic strategies for targeting interleukins in chronic respiratory diseasesLipopolysaccharide Regulates Pro- and Anti-Inflammatory Cytokines, Corticosterone, and Melatonin in ToadsThe central role of IL-33/IL-1RL1 pathway in asthma: From pathogenesis to interventionAsthma and COVID-19: Emphasis on Adequate of as of and as a Effect of the resistance in asthma: and molecular effects of on a of allergic between and and gene expression of glucocorticoid and receptors from the for of human respiratory with glucocorticoids in the treatment of asthma: of the oral corticosteroids and persistent in from the asthma to bronchial asthma as for A of of Melatonin and Glucocorticoid with in the a between Melatonin and of in Steroid Drug by of proteins during the Efficacy of to in a of corticosteroids in asthma: the between and the novel mode of action of the Association and Lung in with as for in of the and of of in Lung and in and cells in asthma: from to human asthma of and the and of a of asthmatic adults patients with intermittent and persistent allergic for combination to to in activated macrophage and asthmatic airway inflammation in a asthma of inhaled corticosteroids does not decrease chest in patients with cell to to in Effects of From effects of on airway asthma and therapy of in as for of airway inflammation in a of allergic regulates the and inflammatory of airway smooth muscle of factors to inhaled corticosteroid response in children with asthma: a as in the treatment of necrosis and fluticasone combination histone and in bronchial epithelial cells to Effect of in of human T cells in and not in patients to to to inhaled steroids for and for to for with of inhaled corticosteroids and a Corticosteroids for Corticosteroids in the of to the Effects of on Inflammatory and dexamethasone mast cells from and effects of on airway inflammation in a of and mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of budesonide in A in and of steroid resistance in for the treatment of novel disease mechanisms in to for with to to inhaled steroids for Effects of and a of the and combination for the treatment of oral corticosteroid for of immunoglobulin expression and function in and the of and treatment response and in of a of glucocorticoids in allergic of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: and of inhaled of a novel dose combination of salmeterol and for inhaled control of cell responses by during allergic lung inflammation in and rationale underlying the targeted of inhaled 2 in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and of in the oral corticosteroid for a the of 2 in the treatment of in and corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects on of glucocorticoid action and insensitivity in airways of the cell of on the of patients with bronchial inhibits the expression of in cells through the inhibition of and AP-1 Cell Activation through and Efficacy of corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects on T De to to the mechanism of action of essential of for its for the of Impaired to Glucocorticoids in mechanisms of the action of dexamethasone and glucocorticoids Evidence for in steroids for in of in asthmatic patients not inhaled of and in of in the of by reveals and associated with asthma Regulates and Activation and of in the treatment of and characterization of the receptors from the sputum in asthma and this is not by is associated with and in asthma and inhaled in in the and of in vitro activation of blood cells and of and therapy in and and nuclear receptor Histone in of the Glucocorticoid in of with to Glucocorticoid for and in of in steroid response in chronic obstructive pulmonary the effects of inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients through increased induction of and resistance in glucocorticoid control of characterization of glucocorticoid and of glucocorticoids on the A for an in of in obstructive lung disease through and airway and as novel for asthma and in resistance in inflammatory T cells control lung inflammation during by between and lung function in response to inhaled corticosteroid in patients with of HDAC2 in the of to in asthma: A rationale for corticosteroids as in as novel for Cell or and effect of and alone or in combination in primary human bronchial is a in a of pulmonary strategies for and corticosteroid the of airway smooth muscle in of chronic Glucocorticoid activity is increased in asthmatic airways by inhaled of the of in A of and receptor expression in of asthmatic and and of transcription of T cells in asthma: by allergic and oral and Clinical and Therapeutic and their receptors as for the treatment of expression asthma of of Increased and of corticosteroids on the of in steroids are associated with lung function in with asthma with for of the of in a and airways for of glucocorticoid to treatment and Effects of Corticosteroids in Corticosteroids in the of glucocorticoid actions in airway smooth muscle through allergic asthma in effects of in a of factor and glucocorticoid as an Inflammatory corticosteroids control role of MAPK in human cell and of in Glucocorticoid Steroid in The to on glucocorticoid action and of and Dexamethasone on Lung and Transcription Expression in of with Glucocorticoid and of transduction for the treatment of airway for of Histone in in and glucocorticoid receptor proteins in human by the and Effects of be steroids for of with in the of of smoking on the treatment response in patients with suppress transcriptional up-regulation of receptors in a in vitro of chronic airway protein and of airway of smoking on the treatment response in patients with between the of by a 1 and Regulation of Expression by An in Inflammatory Lung Regulation of Histone and of the Inflammatory for New of the of Effects of Corticosteroids in of the of for in Corticosteroids for of resistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary of histone in of in of and Corticosteroids for for airway for the treatment of asthma and of on and 2 September factors 2 September 2 September by of

Annals of Internal Medicine · review · 370 citationsread the source →

Social connection and mortality in UK Biobank: a prospective cohort analysis.

Background: Components of social connection are associated with mortality, but research examining their independent and combined effects in the same dataset is lacking. This study aimed to examine the independent and combined associations between functional and structural components of social connection and mortality. Methods: Analysis of 458,146 participants with full data from the UK Biobank cohort linked to mortality registers. Social connection was assessed using two functional (frequency of ability to confide in someone close and often feeling lonely) and three structural (frequency of friends/family visits, weekly group activities, and living alone) component measures. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the associations with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Results: Over a median of 12.6 years (IQR 11.9-13.3) follow-up, 33,135 (7.2%) participants died, including 5112 (1.1%) CVD deaths. All social connection measures were independently associated with both outcomes. Friends/family visit frequencies < monthly were associated with a higher risk of mortality indicating a threshold effect. There were interactions between living alone and friends/family visits and between living alone and weekly group activity. For example, compared with daily friends/family visits-not living alone, there was higher all-cause mortality for daily visits-living alone (HR 1.19 [95% CI 1.12-1.26]), for never having visits-not living alone (1.33 [1.22-1.46]), and for never having visits-living alone (1.77 [1.61-1.95]). Never having friends/family visits whilst living alone potentially counteracted benefits from other components as mortality risks were highest for those reporting both never having visits and living alone regardless of weekly group activity or functional components. When all measures were combined into overall functional and structural components, there was an interaction between components: compared with participants defined as not isolated by both components, those considered isolated by both components had higher CVD mortality (HR 1.63 [1.51-1.76]) than each component alone (functional isolation 1.17 [1.06-1.29]; structural isolation 1.27 [1.18-1.36]). Conclusions: This work suggests (1) a potential threshold effect for friends/family visits, (2) that those who live alone with additional concurrent markers of structural isolation may represent a high-risk population, (3) that beneficial associations for some types of social connection might not be felt when other types of social connection are absent, and (4) considering both functional and structural components of social connection may help to identify the most isolated in society.

BMC medicine · 34 citationsread the source →

The vascular response to acute sauna heating is similar in young and middle-aged adults.

Sauna has been linked to a reduction of cardiovascular disease risk and is a promising nonpharmacological treatment for populations at risk of cardiovascular disease. This study examined the vascular response to an acute bout of sauna heating in young and middle-aged individuals. Ten young (25 ± 4 yr, 6 males and 4 females) and eight middle-aged adults (56 ± 4 yr, 4 males and 4 females) underwent 40 min of sauna exposure at 80°C. Esophageal and intramuscular temperatures, brachial and superficial femoral artery blood flow, artery diameter, and shear rates were recorded at baseline and following heat exposure. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was measured at baseline and following 90 min of recovery. Esophageal and muscle temperatures increased similarly in the young and middle-aged adults by 1.5 ± 0.53 and 1.95 ± 0.70°C, respectively (P < 0.05). The shear rate increased by 170-200% (P < 0.001), while blood flow increased by 180-390% (P < 0.001) in the superficial femoral and brachial arteries, respectively, and did not differ between age groups (P = 0.190-0.899). Systolic blood pressure was reduced from 135 ± 17 to 122 ± 20 mmHg (P = 0.017) in middle-aged participants. These data indicate that young and middle-aged adults have similar vascular responses to acute sauna heating.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Sauna therapy has been shown to improve cardiovascular health and function in older adults and individuals with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Specifically, improvements in vascular function have been reported and have been attributed to the increased hemodynamic stimuli on the vasculature associated with thermal stress. The present study quantified this hemodynamic response to a sauna protocol associated with improved cardiovascular health across the lifespan. Our data show that middle-aged adults have the same shear rate and blood flow response to sauna as young adults.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 5 citationsread the source →