One query across six libraries. Commentary sits inside the verse it comments on.
Research library
المكتبة البحثية26 results
Peer-reviewed works with DOI and abstract, discovered from MEDLINE-indexed literature. Candidates: no tier, no stated finding, not yet read.
Kivimäki M, Virtanen M, Kawachi I, Nyberg ST, Alfredsson L, Batty GD, Bjorner JB, Borritz M, Brunner EJ, Burr H, Dragano N, Ferrie JE, Fransson EI, Hamer M, Heikkilä K, Knutsson A, Koskenvuo M, Madsen IEH, Nielsen ML, Nordin M, Oksanen T, Pejtersen JH, Pentti J, Rugulies R, Salo P, Siegrist J, Steptoe A, Suominen S, Theorell T, Vahtera J, Westerholm PJM, Westerlund H, Singh-Manoux A, Jokela M. (2015)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · meta-analysis Long working hours, socioeconomic status, and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data from 222 120 individuals.
Background: Working long hours might have adverse health effects, but whether this is true for all socioeconomic status groups is unclear. In this meta-analysis stratified by socioeconomic status, we investigated the role of long working hours as a risk factor for type 2 diabetes.
Methods: We identified four published studies through a systematic literature search of PubMed and Embase up to April 30, 2014. Study inclusion criteria were English-language publication; prospective design (cohort study); investigation of the effect of working hours or overtime work; incident diabetes as an outcome; and relative risks, odds ratios, or hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs, or sufficient information to calculate these estimates. Additionally, we used unpublished individual-level data from 19 cohort studies from the Individual-Participant-Data Meta-analysis in Working-Populations Consortium and international open-access data archives. Effect estimates from published and unpublished data from 222 120 men and women from the USA, Europe, Japan, and Australia were pooled with random-effects meta-analysis.
Findings: During 1·7 million person-years at risk, 4963 individuals developed diabetes (incidence 29 per 10 000 person-years). The minimally adjusted summary risk ratio for long (≥55 h per week) compared with standard working hours (35-40 h) was 1·07 (95% CI 0·89-1·27, difference in incidence three cases per 10 000 person-years) with significant heterogeneity in study-specific estimates (I(2)=53%, p=0·0016). In an analysis stratified by socioeconomic status, the association between long working hours and diabetes was evident in the low socioeconomic status group (risk ratio 1·29, 95% CI 1·06-1·57, difference in incidence 13 per 10 000 person-years, I(2)=0%, p=0·4662), but was null in the high socioeconomic status group (1·00, 95% CI 0·80-1·25, incidence difference zero per 10 000 person-years, I(2)=15%, p=0·2464). The association in the low socioeconomic status group was robust to adjustment for age, sex, obesity, and physical activity, and remained after exclusion of shift workers.
Interpretation: In this meta-analysis, the link between longer working hours and type 2 diabetes was apparent only in individuals in the low socioeconomic status groups.
Funding: Medical Research Council, European Union New and Emerging Risks in Occupational Safety and Health research programme, Finnish Work Environment Fund, Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Research, German Social Accident Insurance, Danish National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Academy of Finland, Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (Netherlands), Economic and Social Research Council, US National Institutes of Health, and British Heart Foundation.
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology · meta-analysis · 174 citationsread the source →
Effects of Psilocybin-Assisted Therapy on Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a substantial public health burden, but current treatments have limited effectiveness and adherence. Recent evidence suggests that 1 or 2 administrations of psilocybin with psychological support produces antidepressant effects in patients with cancer and in those with treatment-resistant depression.
Objective: To investigate the effect of psilocybin therapy in patients with MDD.
Design, setting, and participants: This randomized, waiting list-controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Center for Psychedelic and Consciousness Research at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in Baltimore, Maryland. Adults aged 21 to 75 years with an MDD diagnosis, not currently using antidepressant medications, and without histories of psychotic disorder, serious suicide attempt, or hospitalization were eligible to participate. Enrollment occurred between August 2017 and April 2019, and the 4-week primary outcome assessments were completed in July 2019. A total of 27 participants were randomized to an immediate treatment condition group (n = 15) or delayed treatment condition group (waiting list control condition; n = 12). Data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2019, to July 31, 2020, and included participants who completed the intervention (evaluable population).
Interventions: Two psilocybin sessions (session 1: 20 mg/70 kg; session 2: 30 mg/70 kg) were given (administered in opaque gelatin capsules with approximately 100 mL of water) in the context of supportive psychotherapy (approximately 11 hours). Participants were randomized to begin treatment immediately or after an 8-week delay.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome, depression severity was assessed with the GRID-Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (GRID-HAMD) scores at baseline (score of ≥17 required for enrollment) and weeks 5 and 8 after enrollment for the delayed treatment group, which corresponded to weeks 1 and 4 after the intervention for the immediate treatment group. Secondary outcomes included the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self Rated (QIDS-SR).
Results: Of the randomized participants, 24 of 27 (89%) completed the intervention and the week 1 and week 4 postsession assessments. This population had a mean (SD) age of 39.8 (12.2) years, was composed of 16 women (67%), and had a mean (SD) baseline GRID-HAMD score of 22.8 (3.9). The mean (SD) GRID-HAMD scores at weeks 1 and 4 (8.0 [7.1] and 8.5 [5.7]) in the immediate treatment group were statistically significantly lower than the scores at the comparable time points of weeks 5 and 8 (23.8 [5.4] and 23.5 [6.0]) in the delayed treatment group. The effect sizes were large at week 5 (Cohen d = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4-3.5; P < .001) and week 8 (Cohen d = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-3.7; P < .001). The QIDS-SR documented a rapid decrease in mean (SD) depression score from baseline to day 1 after session 1 (16.7 [3.5] vs 6.3 [4.4]; Cohen d = 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5; P < .001), which remained statistically significantly reduced through the week 4 follow-up (6.0 [5.7]; Cohen d = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.5-3.0; P < .001). In the overall sample, 17 participants (71%) at week 1 and 17 (71%) at week 4 had a clinically significant response to the intervention (≥50% reduction in GRID-HAMD score), and 14 participants (58%) at week 1 and 13 participants (54%) at week 4 were in remission (≤7 GRID-HAMD score).
Conclusions and relevance: Findings suggest that psilocybin with therapy is efficacious in treating MDD, thus extending the results of previous studies of this intervention in patients with cancer and depression and of a nonrandomized study in patients with treatment-resistant depression.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03181529.
JAMA psychiatry · randomised controlled trial · 900 citationsread the source →
Internet-based intervention for smoking cessation (StopAdvisor) in people with low and high socioeconomic status: a randomised controlled trial.
Background: Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation could help millions of people stop smoking at very low unit costs; however, long-term biochemically verified evidence is scarce and such interventions might be less effective for smokers with low socioeconomic status than for those with high status because of lower online literacy to engage with websites. We aimed to assess a new interactive internet-based intervention (StopAdvisor) for smoking cessation that was designed with particular attention directed to people with low socioeconomic status.
Methods: We did this online randomised controlled trial between Dec 6, 2011, and Oct 11, 2013, in the UK. Participants aged 18 years and older who smoked every day were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive treatment with StopAdvisor or an information-only website. Randomisation was automated with an unseen random number function embedded in the website to establish which treatment was revealed after the online baseline assessment. Recruitment continued until the required sample size had been achieved from both high and low socioeconomic status subpopulations. Participants, and researchers who obtained data and did laboratory analyses, were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was 6 month sustained, biochemically verified abstinence. The main secondary outcome was 6 month, 7 day biochemically verified point prevalence. Analysis was by intention to treat. Homogeneity of intervention effect across the socioeconomic subsamples was first assessed to establish whether overall or separate subsample analyses were appropriate. The study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN99820519.
Findings: We randomly assigned 4613 participants to the StopAdvisor group (n=2321) or the control group (n=2292); 2142 participants were of low socioeconomic status and 2471 participants were of high status. The overall rate of smoking cessation was similar between participants in the StopAdvisor and control groups for the primary (237 [10%] vs 220 [10%] participants; relative risk [RR] 1·06, 95% CI 0·89-1·27; p=0·49) and the secondary (358 [15%] vs 332 [15%] participants; 1·06, 0·93-1·22; p=0·37) outcomes; however, the intervention effect differed across socioeconomic status subsamples (1·44, 0·99-2·09; p=0·0562 and 1·37, 1·02-1·84; p=0·0360, respectively). StopAdvisor helped participants with low socioeconomic status stop smoking compared with the information-only website (primary outcome: 90 [8%] of 1088 vs 64 [6%] of 1054 participants; RR 1·36, 95% CI 1·00-1·86; p=0·0499; secondary outcome: 136 [13%] vs 100 [10%] participants; 1·32, 1·03-1·68, p=0·0267), but did not improve cessation rates in those with high socioeconomic status (147 [12%] of 1233 vs 156 [13%] of 1238 participants; 0·95, 0·77-1·17; p=0·61 and 222 [18%] vs 232 [19%] participants; 0·96, 0·81-1·13, p=0·64, respectively).
Interpretation: StopAdvisor was more effective than an information-only website in smokers of low, but not high, socioeconomic status. StopAdvisor could be implemented easily and made freely available, which would probably improve the success rates of smokers with low socioeconomic status who are seeking online support.
Funding: National Prevention Research Initiative.
The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · randomised controlled trial · 99 citationsread the source →
Volandes AE, Paasche-Orlow MK, Barry MJ, Gillick MR, Minaker KL, Chang Y, Cook EF, Abbo ED, El-Jawahri A, Mitchell SL. (2009)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usBMJ (Clinical research ed.) · randomised controlled trial Video decision support tool for advance care planning in dementia: randomised controlled trial.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of a video decision support tool on the preferences for future medical care in older people if they develop advanced dementia, and the stability of those preferences after six weeks.
Design: Randomised controlled trial conducted between 1 September 2007 and 30 May 2008. Setting Four primary care clinics (two geriatric and two adult medicine) affiliated with three academic medical centres in Boston.
Participants: Convenience sample of 200 older people (>or=65 years) living in the community with previously scheduled appointments at one of the clinics. Mean age was 75 and 58% were women.
Intervention: Verbal narrative alone (n=106) or with a video decision support tool (n=94).
Main outcome measures: Preferred goal of care: life prolonging care (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation), limited care (admission to hospital, antibiotics, but not cardiopulmonary resuscitation), or comfort care (treatment only to relieve symptoms). Preferences after six weeks. The principal category for analysis was the difference in proportions of participants in each group who preferred comfort care.
Results: Among participants receiving the verbal narrative alone, 68 (64%) chose comfort care, 20 (19%) chose limited care, 15 (14%) chose life prolonging care, and three (3%) were uncertain. In the video group, 81 (86%) chose comfort care, eight (9%) chose limited care, four (4%) chose life prolonging care, and one (1%) was uncertain (chi(2)=13.0, df=3, P=0.003). Among all participants the factors associated with a greater likelihood of opting for comfort care were being a college graduate or higher, good or better health status, greater health literacy, white race, and randomisation to the video arm. In multivariable analysis, participants in the video group were more likely to prefer comfort care than those in the verbal group (adjusted odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 8.6). Participants were re-interviewed after six weeks. Among the 94/106 (89%) participants re-interviewed in the verbal group, 27 (29%) changed their preferences (kappa=0.35). Among the 84/94 (89%) participants re-interviewed in the video group, five (6%) changed their preferences (kappa=0.79) (P<0.001 for difference).
Conclusion: Older people who view a video depiction of a patient with advanced dementia after hearing a verbal description of the condition are more likely to opt for comfort as their goal of care compared with those who solely listen to a verbal description. They also have more stable preferences over time.
Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00704886.
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · randomised controlled trial · 207 citationsread the source →
Pharmacological treatments for generalised anxiety disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Background: Generalised anxiety disorder is a disease that can be associated with substantial dysfunction. Pharmacological treatment is often the first choice for clinicians because of the cost and resource constraints of psychological alternatives, but there is a paucity of comparative information for the multiple available drug choices.
Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed on randomised trials in adult outpatients with generalised anxiety disorder identified from MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang data, Drugs@FDA and commercial pharmaceutical registries. Placebo and active control trials were included. Data were extracted from all manuscripts and reports. Primary outcomes were efficacy (mean difference [MD] in change in Hamilton Anxiety Scale Score) and acceptability (study discontinuations for any cause). We estimated summary mean treatment differences and odds ratios using network meta-analyses with random effects. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018087106.
Findings: Studies were published between Jan 1, 1994 and Aug 1, 2017, in which 1992 potential studies were screened for inclusion. This analysis is based on 89 trials, which included 25 441 patients randomly assigned to 22 different active drugs or placebo. Duloxetine (MD -3·13, 95% credible interval [CrI] -4·13 to -2·13), pregabalin (MD -2·79, 95% CrI -3·69 to -1·91), venlafaxine (MD -2·69, 95% CrI -3·50 to -1·89), and escitalopram (MD -2·45, 95% CrI -3·27 to -1·63) were more efficacious than placebo with relatively good acceptability. Mirtazapine, sertraline, fluoxetine, buspirone, and agomelatine were also found to be efficacious and well tolerated but these findings were limited by small sample sizes. Quetiapine (MD -3·60 95% CrI -4·83 to -2·39) had the largest effect on HAM-A but it was poorly tolerated (odds ratio 1·44, 95% CrI 1·16-1·80) when compared with placebo. Likewise, paroxetine and benzodiazepines were effective but also poorly tolerated when compared with placebo. Risk of reporting bias was considered low, and when possible all completed studies were included to avoid publication bias.
Interpretation: To our knowledge, this is the largest contemporary review of pharmacological agents for the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder by use of network analysis. There are several effective treatment choices for generalised anxiety disorder across classes of medication. The failure of initial pharmacological therapy might not be a reason to abandon a pharmacological treatment strategy.
Funding: No funding was received for this research.
Lancet (London, England) · systematic review · 217 citationsread the source →
Weibel S, Rücker G, Eberhart LH, Pace NL, Hartl HM, Jordan OL, Mayer D, Riemer M, Schaefer MS, Raj D, Backhaus I, Helf A, Schlesinger T, Kienbaum P, Kranke P. (2020)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews · systematic review Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common adverse effect of anaesthesia and surgery. Up to 80% of patients may be affected. These outcomes are a major cause of patient dissatisfaction and may lead to prolonged hospital stay and higher costs of care along with more severe complications. Many antiemetic drugs are available for prophylaxis. They have various mechanisms of action and side effects, but there is still uncertainty about which drugs are most effective with the fewest side effects.
Objectives: • To compare the efficacy and safety of different prophylactic pharmacologic interventions (antiemetic drugs) against no treatment, against placebo, or against each other (as monotherapy or combination prophylaxis) for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia • To generate a clinically useful ranking of antiemetic drugs (monotherapy and combination prophylaxis) based on efficacy and safety • To identify the best dose or dose range of antiemetic drugs in terms of efficacy and safety SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews. The first search was performed in November 2017 and was updated in April 2020. In the update of the search, 39 eligible studies were found that were not included in the analysis (listed as awaiting classification).
Selection criteria: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing effectiveness or side effects of single antiemetic drugs in any dose or combination against each other or against an inactive control in adults undergoing any type of surgery under general anaesthesia. All antiemetic drugs belonged to one of the following substance classes: 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists, D₂ receptor antagonists, NK₁ receptor antagonists, corticosteroids, antihistamines, and anticholinergics. No language restrictions were applied. Abstract publications were excluded.
Data collection and analysis: A review team of 11 authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias and subsequently extracted data. We performed pair-wise meta-analyses for drugs of direct interest (amisulpride, aprepitant, casopitant, dexamethasone, dimenhydrinate, dolasetron, droperidol, fosaprepitant, granisetron, haloperidol, meclizine, methylprednisolone, metoclopramide, ondansetron, palonosetron, perphenazine, promethazine, ramosetron, rolapitant, scopolamine, and tropisetron) compared to placebo (inactive control). We performed network meta-analyses (NMAs) to estimate the relative effects and ranking (with placebo as reference) of all available single drugs and combinations. Primary outcomes were vomiting within 24 hours postoperatively, serious adverse events (SAEs), and any adverse event (AE). Secondary outcomes were drug class-specific side effects (e.g. headache), mortality, early and late vomiting, nausea, and complete response. We performed subgroup network meta-analysis with dose of drugs as a moderator variable using dose ranges based on previous consensus recommendations. We assessed certainty of evidence of NMA treatment effects for all primary outcomes and drug class-specific side effects according to GRADE (CINeMA, Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis). We restricted GRADE assessment to single drugs of direct interest compared to placebo.
Main results: We included 585 studies (97,516 randomized participants). Most of these studies were small (median sample size of 100); they were published between 1965 and 2017 and were primarily conducted in Asia (51%), Europe (25%), and North America (16%). Mean age of the overall population was 42 years. Most participants were women (83%), had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II (70%), received perioperative opioids (88%), and underwent gynaecologic (32%) or gastrointestinal surgery (19%) under general anaesthesia using volatile anaesthetics (88%). In this review, 44 single drugs and 51 drug combinations were compared. Most studies investigated only single drugs (72%) and included an inactive control arm (66%). The three most investigated single drugs in this review were ondansetron (246 studies), dexamethasone (120 studies), and droperidol (97 studies). Almost all studies (89%) reported at least one efficacy outcome relevant for this review. However, only 56% reported at least one relevant safety outcome. Altogether, 157 studies (27%) were assessed as having overall low risk of bias, 101 studies (17%) overall high risk of bias, and 327 studies (56%) overall unclear risk of bias. Vomiting within 24 hours postoperatively Relative effects from NMA for vomiting within 24 hours (282 RCTs, 50,812 participants, 28 single drugs, and 36 drug combinations) suggest that 29 out of 36 drug combinations and 10 out of 28 single drugs showed a clinically important benefit (defined as the upper end of the 95% confidence interval (CI) below a risk ratio (RR) of 0.8) compared to placebo. Combinations of drugs were generally more effective than single drugs in preventing vomiting. However, single NK₁ receptor antagonists showed treatment effects similar to most of the drug combinations. High-certainty evidence suggests that the following single drugs reduce vomiting (ordered by decreasing efficacy): aprepitant (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.38, high certainty, rank 3/28 of single drugs); ramosetron (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.59, high certainty, rank 5/28); granisetron (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.54, high certainty, rank 6/28); dexamethasone (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.57, high certainty, rank 8/28); and ondansetron (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.60, high certainty, rank 13/28). Moderate-certainty evidence suggests that the following single drugs probably reduce vomiting: fosaprepitant (RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.21, moderate certainty, rank 1/28) and droperidol (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.69, moderate certainty, rank 20/28). Recommended and high doses of granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol showed clinically important benefit, but low doses showed no clinically important benefit. Aprepitant was used mainly at high doses, ramosetron at recommended doses, and fosaprepitant at doses of 150 mg (with no dose recommendation available). Frequency of SAEs Twenty-eight RCTs were included in the NMA for SAEs (10,766 participants, 13 single drugs, and eight drug combinations). The certainty of evidence for SAEs when using one of the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol compared to placebo) ranged from very low to low. Droperidol (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08 to 9.71, low certainty, rank 6/13) may reduce SAEs. We are uncertain about the effects of aprepitant (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.26 to 7.36, very low certainty, rank 11/13), ramosetron (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.05 to 15.74, very low certainty, rank 7/13), granisetron (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.11 to 13.15, very low certainty, rank 10/13), dexamethasone (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.28 to 4.85, very low certainty, rank 9/13), and ondansetron (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.32 to 8.10, very low certainty, rank 12/13). No studies reporting SAEs were available for fosaprepitant. Frequency of any AE Sixty-one RCTs were included in the NMA for any AE (19,423 participants, 15 single drugs, and 11 drug combinations). The certainty of evidence for any AE when using one of the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol compared to placebo) ranged from very low to moderate. Granisetron (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.05, moderate certainty, rank 7/15) probably has no or little effect on any AE. Dexamethasone (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.08, low certainty, rank 2/15) and droperidol (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98, low certainty, rank 6/15) may reduce any AE. Ondansetron (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.01, low certainty, rank 9/15) may have little or no effect on any AE. We are uncertain about the effects of aprepitant (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97, very low certainty, rank 3/15) and ramosetron (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.54, very low certainty, rank 11/15) on any AE. No studies reporting any AE were available for fosaprepitant. Class-specific side effects For class-specific side effects (headache, constipation, wound infection, extrapyramidal symptoms, sedation, arrhythmia, and QT prolongation) of relevant substances, the certainty of evidence for the best and most reliable anti-vomiting drugs mostly ranged from very low to low. Exceptions were that ondansetron probably increases headache (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.28, moderate certainty, rank 18/23) and probably reduces sedation (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96, moderate certainty, rank 5/24) compared to placebo. The latter effect is limited to recommended and high doses of ondansetron. Droperidol probably reduces headache (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.86, moderate certainty, rank 5/23) compared to placebo. We have high-certainty evidence that dexamethasone (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.09, high certainty, rank 16/24) has no effect on sedation compared to placebo. No studies assessed substance class-specific side effects for fosaprepitant. Direction and magnitude of network effect estimates together with level of evidence certainty are graphically summarized for all pre-defined GRADE-relevant outcomes and all drugs of direct interest compared to placebo in http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4066353.
Authors' conclusions: We found high-certainty evidence that five single drugs (aprepitant, ramosetron, granisetron, dexamethasone, and ondansetron) reduce vomiting, and moderate-certainty evidence that two other single drugs (fosaprepitant and droperidol) probably reduce vomiting, compared to placebo. Four of the six substance classes (5-HT₃ receptor antagonists, D₂ receptor antagonists, NK₁ receptor antagonists, and corticosteroids) were thus represented by at least one drug with important benefit for prevention of vomiting. Combinations of drugs were generally more effective than the corresponding single drugs in preventing vomiting. NK₁ receptor antagonists were the most effective drug class and had comparable efficacy to most of the drug combinations. 5-HT₃ receptor antagonists were the best studied substance class. For most of the single drugs of direct interest, we found only very low to low certainty evidence for safety outcomes such as occurrence of SAEs, any AE, and substance class-specific side effects. Recommended and high doses of granisetron, dexamethasone, ondansetron, and droperidol were more effective than low doses for prevention of vomiting. Dose dependency of side effects was rarely found due to the limited number of studies, except for the less sedating effect of recommended and high doses of ondansetron. The results of the review are transferable mainly to patients at higher risk of nausea and vomiting (i.e. healthy women undergoing inhalational anaesthesia and receiving perioperative opioids). Overall study quality was limited, but certainty assessments of effect estimates consider this limitation. No further efficacy studies are needed as there is evidence of moderate to high certainty for seven single drugs with relevant benefit for prevention of vomiting. However, additional studies are needed to investigate potential side effects of these drugs and to examine higher-risk patient populations (e.g. individuals with diabetes and heart disease).
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · systematic review · 127 citationsread the source →
Interventions for improving sleep quality in people with chronic kidney disease.
Background: Sleep disorders are commonly experienced by people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Several approaches for improving sleep quality are used in clinical practice including relaxation techniques, exercise, acupressure, and medication.
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness and associated adverse events of interventions designed to improve sleep quality among adults and children with CKD including people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treated with dialysis or kidney transplantation.
Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 8 October 2018 with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-randomised RCTs of any intervention in which investigators reported effects on sleep quality. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts of identified records.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias for included studies. The primary outcomes were sleep quality, sleep onset latency, sleep duration, sleep interruption, and sleep efficiency. Risks of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool. Evidence certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach. We calculated treatment estimates as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or mean difference (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) for continuous outcomes to account for heterogeneity in measures of sleep quality.
Main results: Sixty-seven studies involving 3427 participants met the eligibility criteria. Thirty-six studies involving 2239 participants were included in meta-analyses. Follow-up for clinical outcomes ranged between 0.3 and 52.8 weeks (median 5 weeks). Interventions included relaxation techniques, exercise, acupressure, cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), educational interventions, benzodiazepine treatment, dopaminergic agonists, telephone support, melatonin, reflexology, light therapy, different forms of peritoneal dialysis, music, aromatherapy, and massage. Incomplete reporting of key methodological details resulted in uncertain risk of bias in many studies. In very low certainty evidence relaxation techniques had uncertain effects on sleep quality and duration, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), depression, anxiety, and fatigue. Studies were not designed to evaluate the effects of relaxation on sleep latency or hospitalisation. Exercise had uncertain effects on sleep quality (SMD -1.10, 95% CI -2.26 to 0.05; I2 = 90%; 5 studies, 165 participants; very low certainty evidence). Exercise probably decreased depression (MD -9.05, 95% CI -13.72 to -4.39; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 46 participants; moderate certainty evidence) and fatigue (SMD -0.68, 95% CI -1.07 to -0.29; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 107 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Compared with no acupressure, acupressure had uncertain effects on sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scale 0 - 21) (MD -1.27, 95% CI -2.13 to -0.40; I2 = 89%; 6 studies, 367 participants: very low certainty evidence). Acupressure probably slightly improved sleep latency (scale 0 - 3) (MD -0.59, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.27; I2 = 0%; 3 studies, 173 participants; moderate certainty evidence) and sleep time (scale 0 - 3) (MD -0.60, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.09; I2 = 68%; 3 studies, 173 participants; moderate certainty evidence), although effects on sleep disturbance were uncertain as the evidence certainty was very low (scale 0 - 3) (MD -0.49, 95% CI -1.16 to 0.19; I2 = 97%). In moderate certainty evidence, acupressure probably decrease fatigue (MD -1.07, 95% CI -1.67 to -0.48; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 137 participants). Acupressure had uncertain effects on depression (MD -3.65, 95% CI -7.63 to 0.33; I2 = 27%; 2 studies, 137 participants; very low certainty evidence) while studies were not designed to evaluate the effect of acupressure on HRQoL, anxiety, or hospitalisation. It was uncertain whether acupressure compared with sham acupressure improved sleep quality (PSQI scale 0 to 21) because the certainty of the evidence was very low (MD -2.25, 95% CI -6.33 to 1.82; I2 = 96%; 2 studies, 129 participants), but total sleep time may have been improved (SMD -0.34, 95% CI -0.73 to 0.04; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 107 participants; low certainty evidence). 2 =2 =There were no studies designed to directly examine and/or correlate efficacy of any interventions aimed at improving sleep that may have been attempted for the spectrum of sleep disordered breathing. No studies reported treatment effects for children. Adverse effects of therapies were very uncertain.
Authors' conclusions: The evidence base for improving sleep quality and related outcomes for adults and children with CKD is sparse. Relaxation techniques and exercise had uncertain effects on sleep outcomes. Acupressure may improve sleep latency and duration, although these findings are based on few studies. The effects of acupressure were not confirmed in studies in which sham acupressure was used as the control. Given the very low certainly evidence, future research will very likely change the evidence base. Based on the importance of symptom management to patients, caregivers and clinicians, future studies of sleep interventions among people with CKD should be a priority.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · systematic review · 45 citationsread the source →
van der Steen JT, Radbruch L, Hertogh CM, de Boer ME, Hughes JC, Larkin P, Francke AL, Jünger S, Gove D, Firth P, Koopmans RT, Volicer L, European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC). (2014)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usPalliative medicine White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: a Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care.
Background: Dementia is a life-limiting disease without curative treatments. Patients and families may need palliative care specific to dementia.
Aim: To define optimal palliative care in dementia.
Methods: Five-round Delphi study. Based on literature, a core group of 12 experts from 6 countries drafted a set of core domains with salient recommendations for each domain. We invited 89 experts from 27 countries to evaluate these in a two-round online survey with feedback. Consensus was determined according to predefined criteria. The fourth round involved decisions by the core team, and the fifth involved input from the European Association for Palliative Care.
Results: A total of 64 (72%) experts from 23 countries evaluated a set of 11 domains and 57 recommendations. There was immediate and full consensus on the following eight domains, including the recommendations: person-centred care, communication and shared decision-making; optimal treatment of symptoms and providing comfort (these two identified as central to care and research); setting care goals and advance planning; continuity of care; psychosocial and spiritual support; family care and involvement; education of the health care team; and societal and ethical issues. After revision, full consensus was additionally reached for prognostication and timely recognition of dying. Recommendations on nutrition and dehydration (avoiding overly aggressive, burdensome or futile treatment) and on dementia stages in relation to care goals (applicability of palliative care) achieved moderate consensus.
Conclusion: We have provided the first definition of palliative care in dementia based on evidence and consensus, a framework to provide guidance for clinical practice, policy and research.
Palliative medicine · 590 citationsread the source →
Shinde S, Weiss HA, Varghese B, Khandeparkar P, Pereira B, Sharma A, Gupta R, Ross DA, Patton G, Patel V. (2018)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usLancet (London, England) · randomised controlled trial Promoting school climate and health outcomes with the SEHER multi-component secondary school intervention in Bihar, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Background: School environments affect health and academic outcomes. With increasing secondary school retention in low-income and middle-income countries, promoting quality school social environments could offer a scalable opportunity to improve adolescent health and wellbeing.
Methods: We did a cluster-randomised trial to assess the effectiveness of a multi-component whole-school health promotion intervention (SEHER) with integrated economic and process evaluations in grade 9 students (aged 13-14 years) at government-run secondary schools in the Nalanda district of Bihar state, India. Schools were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to three groups: the SEHER intervention delivered by a lay counsellor (the SEHER Mitra [SM] group), the SEHER intervention delivered by a teacher (teacher as SEHER Mitra [TSM] group), and a control group in which only the standard government-run classroom-based life-skills Adolescence Education Program was implemented. The primary outcome was school climate measured with the Beyond Blue School Climate Questionnaire (BBSCQ). Students were assessed at the start of the academic year (June, 2015) and again 8 months later at the end of the academic year (March, 2016) via self-completed questionnaires. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02484014.
Findings: Of the 112 eligible schools in the Nalanda district, 75 were randomly selected to participate in the trial. We randomly assigned 25 schools to each of the three groups. One school subsequently dropped out of the TSM group, leaving 24 schools in this group. The baseline survey included a total of 13 035 participants, and the endpoint survey included 14 414 participants. Participants in the SM-delivered intervention schools had substantially higher school climate scores at endpoint survey than those in the control group (BBSCQ baseline-adjusted mean difference [aMD] 7·57 [95% CI 6·11-9·03]; effect size 1·88 [95% CI 1·44-2·32], p<0·0001) and the TSM-delivered intervention (aMD 7·57 [95% CI 6·06-9·08]; effect size 1·88 [95% CI 1·43-2·34], p<0·0001). There was no effect of the TSM-delivered intervention compared with control (aMD -0·009 [95% CI -1·53 to 1·51], effect size 0·00 [95% CI -0·45 to 0·44], p=0·99). Compared with the control group, participants in the SM-delivered intervention schools had moderate to large improvements in the secondary outcomes of depression (aMD -1·23 [95% CI -1·89 to -0·57]), bullying (aMD -0·91 [95% CI -1·15 to -0·66]), violence victimisation (odds ratio [OR] 0·62 [95% CI 0·46-0·84]), violence perpetration (OR 0·68 [95% CI 0·48-0·96]), attitude towards gender equity (aMD 0·41 [95% CI 0·21-0·61]), and knowledge of reproductive and sexual health (aMD 0·29 [95% CI 0·06-0·53]). Similar results for these secondary outcomes were noted for the comparison between SM-delivered intervention schools and TSM-delivered intervention schools (depression: aMD -1·23 [95% CI -1·91 to -0·55]; bullying: aMD -0·83 [95% CI -1·08 to -0·57]; violence victimisation: OR 0·49 [95% CI 0·35-0·67]; violence perpetration: OR 0·49 [95% CI 0·34-0·71]; attitude towards gender equity: aMD 0·23 [95% CI 0·02-0·44]; and knowledge of reproductive and sexual health: aMD 0·22 [95% CI -0·02 to 0·47]). However, no effects on these secondary outcomes were observed for the TSM-delivered intervention schools compared with the control group (depression: aMD -0·03 [95% CI -0·70 to 0·65]; bullying: aMD -0·08 [95% CI -0·34 to 0·18]; violence victimisation: OR 1·27 [95% CI 0·93-1·73]; violence perpetration: OR 1·37 [95% CI 0·95-1·95]; attitude towards gender equity: aMD 0·17 [95% CI -0·09 to 0·38]; and knowledge of reproductive and sexual health: aMD 0·06 [95% CI -0·18 to 0·32]).
Interpretation: The multi-component whole-school SEHER health promotion intervention had substantial beneficial effects on school climate and health-related outcomes when delivered by lay counsellors, but no effects when delivered by teachers. Future research should focus on the evaluation of the scaling up of the SEHER intervention in diverse contexts and delivery agents.
Funding: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, USA and the United Nations Population Fund India Office.
Lancet (London, England) · randomised controlled trial · 121 citationsread the source →
Goldstein LH, Robinson EJ, Mellers JDC, Stone J, Carson A, Reuber M, Medford N, McCrone P, Murray J, Richardson MP, Pilecka I, Eastwood C, Moore M, Mosweu I, Perdue I, Landau S, Chalder T, CODES study group. (2020)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usThe lancet. Psychiatry · randomised controlled trial Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Background: Dissociative seizures are paroxysmal events resembling epilepsy or syncope with characteristic features that allow them to be distinguished from other medical conditions. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) plus standardised medical care with standardised medical care alone for the reduction of dissociative seizure frequency.
Methods: In this pragmatic, parallel-arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial, we initially recruited participants at 27 neurology or epilepsy services in England, Scotland, and Wales. Adults (≥18 years) who had dissociative seizures in the previous 8 weeks and no epileptic seizures in the previous 12 months were subsequently randomly assigned (1:1) from 17 liaison or neuropsychiatry services following psychiatric assessment, to receive standardised medical care or CBT plus standardised medical care, using a web-based system. Randomisation was stratified by neuropsychiatry or liaison psychiatry recruitment site. The trial manager, chief investigator, all treating clinicians, and patients were aware of treatment allocation, but outcome data collectors and trial statisticians were unaware of treatment allocation. Patients were followed up 6 months and 12 months after randomisation. The primary outcome was monthly dissociative seizure frequency (ie, frequency in the previous 4 weeks) assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes assessed at 12 months were: seizure severity (intensity) and bothersomeness; longest period of seizure freedom in the previous 6 months; complete seizure freedom in the previous 3 months; a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency relative to baseline; changes in dissociative seizures (rated by others); health-related quality of life; psychosocial functioning; psychiatric symptoms, psychological distress, and somatic symptom burden; and clinical impression of improvement and satisfaction. p values and statistical significance for outcomes were reported without correction for multiple comparisons as per our protocol. Primary and secondary outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population with multiple imputation for missing observations. This trial is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial registry, ISRCTN05681227, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02325544.
Findings: Between Jan 16, 2015, and May 31, 2017, we randomly assigned 368 patients to receive CBT plus standardised medical care (n=186) or standardised medical care alone (n=182); of whom 313 had primary outcome data at 12 months (156 [84%] of 186 patients in the CBT plus standardised medical care group and 157 [86%] of 182 patients in the standardised medical care group). At 12 months, no significant difference in monthly dissociative seizure frequency was identified between the groups (median 4 seizures [IQR 0-20] in the CBT plus standardised medical care group vs 7 seizures [1-35] in the standardised medical care group; estimated incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·56-1·09]; p=0·144). Dissociative seizures were rated as less bothersome in the CBT plus standardised medical care group than the standardised medical care group (estimated mean difference -0·53 [95% CI -0·97 to -0·08]; p=0·020). The CBT plus standardised medical care group had a longer period of dissociative seizure freedom in the previous 6 months (estimated IRR 1·64 [95% CI 1·22 to 2·20]; p=0·001), reported better health-related quality of life on the EuroQoL-5 Dimensions-5 Level Health Today visual analogue scale (estimated mean difference 6·16 [95% CI 1·48 to 10·84]; p=0·010), less impairment in psychosocial functioning on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (estimated mean difference -4·12 [95% CI -6·35 to -1·89]; p<0·001), less overall psychological distress than the standardised medical care group on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-10 scale (estimated mean difference -1·65 [95% CI -2·96 to -0·35]; p=0·013), and fewer somatic symptoms on the modified Patient Health Questionnaire-15 scale (estimated mean difference -1·67 [95% CI -2·90 to -0·44]; p=0·008). Clinical improvement at 12 months was greater in the CBT plus standardised medical care group than the standardised medical care alone group as reported by patients (estimated mean difference 0·66 [95% CI 0·26 to 1·04]; p=0·001) and by clinicians (estimated mean difference 0·47 [95% CI 0·21 to 0·73]; p<0·001), and the CBT plus standardised medical care group had greater satisfaction with treatment than did the standardised medical care group (estimated mean difference 0·90 [95% CI 0·48 to 1·31]; p<0·001). No significant differences in patient-reported seizure severity (estimated mean difference -0·11 [95% CI -0·50 to 0·29]; p=0·593) or seizure freedom in the last 3 months of the study (estimated odds ratio [OR] 1·77 [95% CI 0·93 to 3·37]; p=0·083) were identified between the groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were identified in the proportion of patients who had a more than 50% reduction in dissociative seizure frequency compared with baseline (OR 1·27 [95% CI 0·80 to 2·02]; p=0·313). Additionally, the 12-item Short Form survey-version 2 scores (estimated mean difference for the Physical Component Summary score 1·78 [95% CI -0·37 to 3·92]; p=0·105; estimated mean difference for the Mental Component Summary score 2·22 [95% CI -0·30 to 4·75]; p=0·084), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 scale score (estimated mean difference -1·09 [95% CI -2·27 to 0·09]; p=0·069), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scale depression score (estimated mean difference -1·10 [95% CI -2·41 to 0·21]; p=0·099) did not differ significantly between groups. Changes in dissociative seizures (rated by others) could not be assessed due to insufficient data. During the 12-month period, the number of adverse events was similar between the groups: 57 (31%) of 186 participants in the CBT plus standardised medical care group reported 97 adverse events and 53 (29%) of 182 participants in the standardised medical care group reported 79 adverse events.
Interpretation: CBT plus standardised medical care had no statistically significant advantage compared with standardised medical care alone for the reduction of monthly seizures. However, improvements were observed in a number of clinically relevant secondary outcomes following CBT plus standardised medical care when compared with standardised medical care alone. Thus, adults with dissociative seizures might benefit from the addition of dissociative seizure-specific CBT to specialist care from neurologists and psychiatrists. Future work is needed to identify patients who would benefit most from a dissociative seizure-specific CBT approach.
Funding: National Institute for Health Research, Health Technology Assessment programme.
The lancet. Psychiatry · randomised controlled trial · 192 citationsread the source →
Fundamental movement skills and self-concept of children who are overweight.
Objective: Differences in fundamental movement skills and self-perceptions of physical ability and physical appearance of overweight and non-overweight children were investigated.
Method: Overweight (n = 89, mean age = 8.75 ± 1.4 years, BMI z-score = 2.22, SD = 0.46, 46% male) and non-overweight (n = 27, mean age = 8.25 ± 1.5 years, BMI z-score = 0.03, SD = 0.73, 62.1% male) participants enrolled in the KOALA (Kinder Overweight Activity Lifestyle Actions) project were included. The overall objective of the KOALA project was to determine in a randomized controlled trial the effect of a Triple P (Positive Parenting Program), and a family 'Eat Well Be Active' Scouts Camp program on BMI in overweight children. Baseline between-group differences on measures of fundamental movement skills and self-concept perceptions were analyzed using independent samples t-tests. Relationships between BMI and these variables were investigated with multiple linear regression.
Results: Overweight children had lower scores on Bruninks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Performance-2 subtests (Bilateral Coordination, Upper Limb Coordination, Strength, Balance, and Running Speed and Agility), and Physical abilities self-concept than non-overweight children.
Conclusions: Children who were overweight had significant fundamental movement skill difficulties, as well as having poorer Physical abilities self-concept perceptions compared to non-overweight children. The association between increasing BMI and poor performance of gross motor tasks has potential implications for physical activity participation. Future research is needed to determine if fundamental movement skill difficulties and low physical ability self-concept are predisposing factors for children who are overweight or associated outcomes.
International journal of pediatric obesity : IJPO : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · randomised controlled trial · 29 citationsread the source →
Efficacy of an outpatient treatment for prolonged grief disorder: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Background: Abnormal forms of grief, currently referred to as complicated grief or prolonged grief disorder, have been discussed extensively in recent years. While the diagnostic criteria are still debated, there is no doubt that prolonged grief is disabling and may require treatment. To date, few interventions have demonstrated efficacy.
Methods: We investigated whether outpatients suffering from prolonged grief disorder (PGD) benefit from a newly developed integrative cognitive behavioural therapy for prolonged grief (PG-CBT). A total of 51 patients were randomized into two groups, stratified by the type of death and their relationship to the deceased; 24 patients composed the treatment group and 27 patients composed the wait list control group (WG). Treatment consisted of 20-25 sessions. Main outcome was change in grief severity; secondary outcomes were reductions in general psychological distress and in comorbidity.
Results: Patients on average had 2.5 comorbid diagnoses in addition to PGD. Between group effect sizes were large for the improvement of grief symptoms in treatment completers (Cohen׳s d=1.61) and in the intent-to-treat analysis (d=1.32). Comorbid depressive symptoms also improved in PG-CBT compared to WG. The completion rate was 79% in PG-CBT and 89% in WG.
Limitations: The major limitations of this study were a small sample size and that PG-CBT took longer than the waiting time.
Conclusions: PG-CBT was found to be effective with an acceptable dropout rate. Given the number of bereaved people who suffer from PGD, the results are of high clinical relevance.
Journal of affective disorders · randomised controlled trial · 84 citationsread the source →
General procrastination and bedtime procrastination as serial mediators of the relationship between temporal perspective and sleep outcomes.
Adequate and sufficient sleep is essential for good health, effective functioning, and well-being, yet recent trends show increasing sleep deprivation, especially among adolescents and young adults. General procrastination and bedtime procrastination understood as the tendency to delay going to bed without external pressure, may contribute to sleep deprivation and fatigue. This study investigated how individual differences in time perspective are related to sleep sufficiency and daytime fatigue, two different sleep outcomes. For these relationships, the possible role of an intermediate pathway leading through general procrastination and then through bedtime procrastination was also examined. Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory, Irrational Procrastination Scale, Bedtime Procrastination Scale, and Sleep Inventory were completed online by 399 university students (89% females) between the ages of 19 and 27 (M = 21.7, SD = 1.83). Future time perspective predicted lower general procrastination, which in turn was associated with lower bedtime procrastination, and consequently higher sleep sufficiency and lower daytime fatigue. Past negative time perspective predicted higher general procrastination, which in turn was associated with higher bedtime procrastination and consequently lower sleep sufficiency and higher daytime fatigue. These findings suggest that time perspective, general procrastination and bedtime procrastination may play an important role in predicting sleep sufficiency and daytime fatigue.
Scientific reports · 4 citationsread the source →
Piers RD, Azoulay E, Ricou B, Dekeyser Ganz F, Decruyenaere J, Max A, Michalsen A, Maia PA, Owczuk R, Rubulotta F, Depuydt P, Meert AP, Reyners AK, Aquilina A, Bekaert M, Van den Noortgate NJ, Schrauwen WJ, Benoit DD, APPROPRICUS Study Group of the Ethics Section of the ESICM. (2011)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usJAMA · cohort or longitudinal Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians.
Context: Clinicians in intensive care units (ICUs) who perceive the care they provide as inappropriate experience moral distress and are at risk for burnout. This situation may jeopardize patient quality of care and increase staff turnover.
Objective: To determine the prevalence of perceived inappropriateness of care among ICU clinicians and to identify patient-related situations, personal characteristics, and work-related characteristics associated with perceived inappropriateness of care.
Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional evaluation on May 11, 2010, of 82 adult ICUs in 9 European countries and Israel. Participants were 1953 ICU nurses and physicians providing bedside care.
Main outcome measure: Perceived inappropriateness of care, defined as a specific patient-care situation in which the clinician acts in a manner contrary to his or her personal and professional beliefs, as assessed using a questionnaire designed for the study.
Results: Of 1651 respondents (median response rate, 93% overall; interquartile range, 82%-100% [medians 93% among nurses and 100% among physicians]), perceived inappropriateness of care in at least 1 patient was reported by 439 clinicians overall (27%; 95% CI, 24%-29%), 300 of 1218 were nurses (25%), 132 of 407 were physicians (32%), and 26 had missing answers describing job title. Of these 439 individuals, 397 reported 445 situations associated with perceived inappropriateness of care. The most common reports were perceived disproportionate care (290 situations [65%; 95% CI, 58%-73%], of which "too much care" was reported in 89% of situations, followed by "other patients would benefit more" (168 situations [38%; 95% CI, 32%-43%]). Independently associated with perceived inappropriateness of care rates both among nurses and physicians were symptom control decisions directed by physicians only (odds ratio [OR], 1.73; 95% CI, 1.17-2.56; P = .006); involvement of nurses in end-of-life decision making (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.60-0.96; P = .02); good collaboration between nurses and physicians (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56-0.92; P = .009); and freedom to decide how to perform work-related tasks (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.89; P = .002); while a high perceived workload was significantly associated among nurses only (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.07-2.06; P = .02). Perceived inappropriateness of care was independently associated with higher intent to leave a job (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.63; P = .03). In the subset of 69 ICUs for which patient data could be linked, clinicians reported received inappropriateness of care in 207 patients, representing 23% (95% CI, 20%-27%) of 883 ICU beds.
Conclusion: Among a group of European and Israeli ICU clinicians, perceptions of inappropriate care were frequently reported and were inversely associated with factors indicating good teamwork.
JAMA · cohort or longitudinal · 245 citationsread the source →
Rodrigue JR, Cornell DL, Howard RJ. (2008)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons The instability of organ donation decisions by next-of-kin and factors that predict it.
We examined the instability of organ donation decisions made by next-of-kin and factors that predict whether nondonors wish they had consented to donation. Next-of-kin of donor-eligible individuals from one organ procurement organization participated in a semistructured telephone interview. Participants were asked if they would make the same decision if they had to make it again today. Of the 147 next-of-kin donors, 138 (94%) would make the same decision again, 6 (4%) would not consent to donation and 3 (2%) were unsure. Of the 138 next-of-kin nondonors, 89 (64%) would make the same decision again, 37 (27%) would consent to donation and 12 (9%) were unsure. Regret among nondonors was more likely when the next-of-kin had more favorable transplant attitudes (OR = 1.76, CI = 1.15, 2.69), had the first donation discussion with a non-OPO professional (OR = 0.21, CI = 0.13, 0.65), were not told of their loved one's death before this discussion (OR = 0.23, CI = 0.10, 0.50), did not feel they were given enough time to make the decision (OR = 0.25, CI = 0.11, 0.55), had not discussed donation with family members (OR = 0.30, CI = 0.13, 0.72) and had not heard a public service announcement about organ donation (OR = 0.29, CI = 0.13, 0.67). Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) should consider targeting these variables in educational campaigns and donation request approaches.
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 44 citationsread the source →
Mental health aspects of pandemics with special reference to COVID-19
Pandemics are large-scale outbreak of disease that spreads rapidly, afflicting many persons simultaneously across multiple countries.[1] History tells us that as humans spread across the globe so did infections. Infections have been our constant companion since antiquity. Hunters and gatherers formed tribes that turned to farming and formed villages which gradually advanced to metropolis. Urbanization brought residents into denser neighborhoods, which combined with increasing populations are placing increasing pressure on the environment. Catastrophic pandemics have been occurring since antiquity and are frequently mentioned in ancient texts. Pandemics are associated with death, destruction, and devastation. Not surprisingly, pandemics are associated with long-term psychological consequences. A brief estimate of the effects of some of these pandemics is given below. Antonine plague (AD 165) The Antonine plague (the Plague of Galen) began in the far east. Soldiers returning to Rome from the far east brought back the infection which then spread throughout the Roman Empire. The pandemic killed about five million people. Plague of Justinian (541–542) The Justinian Plague (bubonic plague) started in central Africa and spread to Egypt and then hit the Byzantine Empire and many cities around the Mediterranean Sea, spreading with ease via a large number of ships, usually maintained in unhygienic condition, arriving into the ports. The plague killed about half the population of Europe, about 25 million people. Japanese small pox epidemic (735–737) The Japanese small pox epidemic affected most of Japan. As a consequence of this epidemic, approximately 1/3rd of the entire Japanese population (about 1 million) perished.[2] The Black Death (1346–1353) The Black Death or “The Plague” is the first pandemic about which reliable information is available. This pandemic of bubonic plague originated in China in 1334, spread through central Asia and northern India following the Silk Road, and reached Sicily in 1347. Over the next 5 years, it spread throughout Europe, Russia, and the Middle East. The mortality of untreated bubonic plague is close to 70%.[3] Over 50 years, the Black Death caused about 100 million deaths.[4] In subsequent centuries, the plague caused several outbreaks through Europe in causing death and destruction but never with the same ferocity as the initial pandemic.[5] Smallpox (1519–1520) The smallpox epidemic affected the native people of Mexico. It was brought by the European invaders. In this epidemic, about 5 million to 8 million people perished.[6] Cocoliztli epidemic (1545 and 1576) The Cocoliztli (probably indigenous hemorrhagic fevers) epidemics that began in 1545 and 1576 were catastrophic and killed about 7 million to 17 million people in the highlands of Mexico.[6] The 17th-century great plagues The 17th-century “great plagues” included the Great Plague of Seville (1647–1652), the Great Plague of London (1665-1666), and the Great Plague of Vienna (1679). A total of 3 million people died due to these plagues. The Third cholera epidemic (1852) The third cholera epidemic had the highest fatality of the epidemics in the 19th century. The pandemic originated in India and spread across the world. Over a million lives were lost due to this pandemic. The third plague pandemic (1855) The third plague pandemic began with the re-emergence of the disease from its wild rodent reservoir in the Yunnan province of China in 1855. From there, the disease advanced to K'unming in 1866, the Gulf of Tonkin in 1867, and the port of Pakhoi (now Pei-hai) in 1882 and Hong Kong in 1894. From there, it spread to ports in all continents by the infected rats traveling the international trade routes on the new steamships. For the next five decades, the pandemic waxed and waned throughout the world and ended in 1959. The third plague pandemic resulted in 15 million deaths, the majority of which were in India.[7] Yellow fever (the late 1800s) Multiple Yellow fever epidemics ravaged the Americas in the late 1800s, the last ending in 1905. Yellow fever claimed over 100,000 American lives. Though exterminated from America, yellow fever continues to ravage countries in the sub-Saharan Africa and tropical South America. Flu (1889–1890) This flu pandemic occurred due to the H3N8 subtype of the influenza virus. The pandemic originated in Russia and thereafter spread across many countries in the northern hemisphere. The spread of this epidemic was facilitated by the arrival of the modern transport infrastructure. The flu resulted in about one million deaths. Sixth cholera pandemic (1910–1911) The sixth cholera pandemic also originated in India. It spread through ships and other means of transport to the Middle East, North Africa, Eastern Europe, and Russia. The pandemic claimed 8,00,000 lives. The “Spanish Flu” pandemic (1918–1920) ”Spanish Flu” Pandemic was caused by the H1N1 influenza virus. It infected more than 25% of the global population. With a mortality rate of 10%–20%, it caused 50 million, possibly 100 million deaths. The Spanish Flu caused more deaths than the Black Death did in a century.[89] Asian flu (1957–1958) The Asian flu was caused by new influenza A (H2N2) virus of avian origin. The influenza outbreak originated from Singapore, spread to Hong Kong and the eastern coast of the USA in the late 1950s and later died out after a vaccine was introduced. This influenza pandemic claimed about 1.1 million lives. Hong Kong flu (1968) The Hong Kong flu was caused by influenza A (H3N2) virus which originated from an avian influenza A virus and killed one million people. It continues to cause seasonal influenza A virus associated with severe illness in older people. HIV pandemic HIV/AIDS unlike all previous and subsequent pandemics is a slowly progressing global pandemic that has over decades affected all the continents and different populations. In addition, due to the lengthy survival of patients, it has brought a host of challenges in its wake. HIV has infected about 74.9 million individuals all over the world and about 32 million have died (end 2018) since 1981. Every year, it continues to cause about one million deaths globally.[10] Severe acute respiratory syndrome (2002–2003) The first pandemic of the 21st century was severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by the SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV). The condition manifested with severe respiratory symptoms and had a mortality of 10%. It began in China in November 2002 and affected fewer than 10,000 individuals in 26 countries. As a result of effective public health preventive measures worldwide, the pandemic was contained by the mid-2003.[11] For the first time during and after the SARS pandemic, the psychiatric aspects were studied all over the world. Valuable information on the psychological effects of an acute infectious pandemic on affected individuals, families, communities, health-care workers, quarantine, survivors of severe illness, etc., was gathered.[812] The H1N1 or “Swine Flu” Pandemic (2009-2010) The Swine flu began in Mexico and affected over 10% of the population of the world. It caused an estimated 20,000 to500,000 deaths.[1314] Because the disease disproportionately affected healthy young adults, often quickly resulting in severe respiratory failure, it was perceived as extremely threatening. However, the final death rate was lower than the death rates of influenza. The initial announcements and warnings by the WHO caused alarm in the general public, but this changed to distrust and disgruntlement as the predicted dire consequences of the pandemic did not materialize.[15] Governments and health agencies were blamed for panic (”panicdemic”) and pushing vaccines without adequate study to enhance the profits of pharmaceutical firms at the cost of the general public (H1N1 vaccines worth 1.5 billion dollars were administered in 2009 in the USA alone).[816] The COVID-19 pandemic The pandemic caused by novel CoV (COVID-19) began in Wuhan in China and has spread to 215 countries. It has already affected 7,000,000 individuals and killed 313,636. The virus is more transmissible than SARS-CoV and has a case fatality rate of 2.3%.[17] A unique feature of this pandemic is the accompanying “infodemic”– an excess of (mis) information on social media and elsewhere – which is a major hazard to mental well-being during this health crisis.[18] PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS IN PANDEMICS Despite their periodic occurrence and devastating consequences, surprisingly, pandemics have evoked minimal interest in mental health professionals, though the situation has vastly improved in the past decade. Psychosocial stressors in pandemics Pandemics are almost invariably characterized by ambiguity, misunderstanding, and a feeling of urgency.[19] As the causative agent is usually new, in the early stages of a pandemic, there is widespread ambiguity about the chances and effects of becoming infected, along with lack of information and understanding about the most effective mode of prevention and treatment.[20] Other psychosocial stressors related to pandemics include threats to the health of self and loved ones, lockdowns, social distancing, separation from family and friends, death of loved ones, social isolation due to quarantine, shortages of food and medicines, loss of earnings, closure of educational institutions and industries, and cancellation of functions and festivals.[2122] Importance of psychological factors during pandemics The current methods for combating pandemics are largely behavioral or educational interventions comprising of risk communication, vaccination adherence programs, personal protective measures, and social distancing. Extreme psychological distress related to actual or threatened infection is a significant issue. Psychological factors are also essential for understanding and combating the collective disorderly behavioral patterns displayed by people facing widespread, serious infection. Effects of stressful life events and negative emotions on the immune system Stressful life events and negative emotions suppress the immune system to some degree, resulting in enhanced susceptibility to infection.[23] Although the mechanisms of these effects are not exactly known, research has shown that stressors and negative emotions influence the production of lymphocytes and pro-inflammatory cytokines.[23] On the other hand, psychotherapeutic interventions such as cognitive behavioral therapy by decreasing a person's stress proneness and negative emotions, may reduce stress-related immunosuppression.[24] The frantic chase for quack remedies and traditional therapies A serious threat to the health of self or loved ones can impair the person's ability to make rational decisions.[25] At the beginning of a pandemic, reliable vaccines and medical treatment are often not available. In this scenario, to protect themselves and their loved ones, people in desperation turn to quack remedies and dubious traditional therapies. Traditional remedies for influenza include inhalation of vapors of carbolic acid, wearing necklaces of garlic, and drinking pine tar. Folk remedies for SARS included diets of turnips, vinegar, kimchee, or spicy foods, and even smoking cigarettes, all of which were ineffective. We may add cow's urine to this list. During the SARS pandemic, some people in China hired sorcerers, lit firecrackers, and burned fake money. People take large doses of vitamins or herbal supplements in the hope that this will boost their immunity.[2226] Civil unrest, rioting, and violence Widespread sickness, debility, and death during pandemics evoke prosocial, affiliative, supportive, behaviors in the form of mutual aid such as running community kitchens, ambulance services, or disposal of dead bodies.[27] However, civil unrest or riots have sometimes erupted during pandemics.[28] There are numerous examples of groups of citizens clashing violently with health workers, due to fears that the health workers were harming rather than helping them.[22] During the Ebola outbreak in September 2014, eight health-care workers and journalists reached the Guinean village of Worme to teach the villagers how to protect themselves against Ebola. But, the villagers, believing that the workers were spreaders of the disease, attacked and killed them.[29] Villagers in Zhejiang province of China protesting the local government's SARS policy attacked officials and broke windows and furniture of the local offices.[26] The recent attack on health-care workers in Indore and other parts of India can be added to the list. Psychological reactions to stress, harm, and loss in pandemics The majority of people are resilient to stress, and this may be more true for people from developing countries. Many persons who survive major stressful events do not suffer adverse psychological effects. Experience of the recent past however tells us that the psychological effects of pandemics are often larger than the medical effects. For instance, during the West African Ebola outbreak (2014–2015), the “epidemic of fear” affected more people than the epidemic itself.[2230] Similarly, during the 2003 SARS pandemic, the psychological morbidity greatly exceeded the medical morbidity in terms of both the number and duration of impact.[3132] Reactions of people to the stress of pandemic vary from fear to indifference to fatalism.[33] At one end of the spectrum are people who blatantly disregard the risks and refuse to follow the recommended health behaviors including hygiene practices, social distancing, and vaccination. At the opposite end of the spectrum are people who develop intense anxiety or fear. Psychologically, a moderate level of anxiety motivates people to address health threats, but severe anxiety is incapacitating.[22] Studies conducted during the early stages of the Swine flu pandemic that of a community had significant of American some of anxiety about becoming of residents of that were about the health of their family to were not about the infection measures, and on a People had of fear even at of social media was associated with anxiety and behaviors in people had more fear for the of their in by the included more frequently and to health-care out in and stress symptoms were in in perceived stress in anxiety in in and in of the the were associated with recent stressful life a and of and syndrome were associated with quarantine, more than was associated with perceived stress, and Death of a loved one due to COVID-19 was associated with perceived stress, and During from the infected individuals, health-care workers are also This has manifested in their who are health-care workers, to their psychosocial stressors may or psychiatric including anxiety and stress or loss of loved ones in the pandemic may be by or a to widespread including the deaths of loved ones in the pandemic, may result in As a pandemic the general public to the threat and anxiety is However, in individuals, the adverse psychological effects can be severe and of pandemics The of a pandemic is by an for and from the the of developing a new vaccine is and the vaccine will not be it is the This be by Similarly, the of new is also and without is with against the to stressful as At the media that reliable information about the pandemic is for the general At the beginning of an epidemic, measures to that be time for the medical and pharmaceutical are the The of interventions for rates individuals and the virus are quarantine, social distancing, and the The public health during a pandemic is to the outbreak at the with minimal risk is for this of information by the general public to about to themselves from the infection. During a pandemic, and distrust of This can be by in the media and fake in social and through and is However, this is than in the beginning of a pandemic, there is a of information about the causative agent and its During the CoV pandemic in the media the of the This resulted in public of the government's on the of with a of time and the of symptoms was It was also after a of individuals who did not develop symptoms of the disease develop the disease spread the on this the was first in in of new to the were to for on a the to its during the Black the of spread throughout from also the infected, the and their close to the community spread of the infectious this continues to be a and public health to infectious measures measures that are usually recommended include with and and that are frequently and such as and are to the general public, of is Despite the of that individuals frequently do not follow are not by individuals who themselves as a risk of infection are to to be and to be isolation due to social is also by social closure can the spread of infection. from of due to to The due to is a more that of the The for is that by greatly decreasing at in the will reduce of resulting in a of the of and an to the in India the of COVID-19 was the same as in other countries without a that at this the infection spread from 100 people to million persons in A of the epidemic was predicted in that our health system was As a result of the the time to 8 which us an to our health infrastructure. The of the one was is a it and will not as is by the increasing or has been in countries. The and most have been by by and The USA and the have China Wuhan quarantine, but later it to 15 other with include South and The of are available. was a then it be that in countries that did not the our some countries with did have are in countries that did not even has given against total on from Wuhan a to the consequences of of the along with social on the pandemic. that in to reduce the epidemic and the and be the of social in the by the and then the entire without in the a is to be to a of with people and that COVID-19 is spreading There is even of to the be given the of and the of the of is the not the virus but is more to the people from and reactions to The and total on India due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused to our lives. The loss of over our lives and our may of and The to may in five stages including the and total in their loss of a result of to the new a result of and and hope stages are almost the stages of both are by an of It be that this is not a and the reactions of individuals to a some people will and most people are in these stages of the are not in of and people may even back and the stages the final and most of effects of People severe stress and in isolation may symptoms of psychological stress and and including and is a major of the of some the and to and of this can a of and a mental People with may develop symptoms due to to the stress of persons with psychiatric such as and such as may suffer from an or of This also be due to lack of their invariably to social which to and a general of fear and that may and in to psychiatric The fear of themselves or their loved ones to COVID-19 is a and may a mental in population. The in in and fake on social media to the anxiety and that is to mental Psychological effects of loss of of is one of the most and events a has to from the risk of and disease, the loss of a of or and family loss in an a of in and social It a loss of with an and persons with an has been and may be by a of from has been including the with of for an of time and of which is and the is time the death, for is to to life without the and is on a long-term and the of are and with ability to in and its factors for include loss of and adverse of the and the of different for in the of factors for include social and or A study of people that and of the had and anxiety individuals with anxiety and had such as and However, loss has long-term effects. of the consequences of loss on well-being during 3 to 3 after loss that the to loss is not a and are by a that the of a that on an an after loss and not to even after the which is in with In to multiple patterns of that with this with long-term in the in in to loss was for the majority of individuals to by 1 after of pandemics in A ability to to a pandemic on the and of its institutions and also the and behaviors of its The of an is by of of of of and also the of During the COVID-19 pandemic, that with had the rate of in COVID-19 for population and also the deaths for and these of the and institutions that behaviors that and citizens who the have The psychological reactions of people to pandemics are to and not Reactions of people to the stress of pandemic vary from fear to indifference to At one end of the spectrum are people who blatantly disregard the risks and refuse to follow the recommended health At the opposite end of the spectrum are people who develop intense anxiety or fear. Although the majority of the population are resilient to the stress of many health anxiety and and some develop psychiatric including anxiety and As a pandemic the general public to the threat and anxiety is However, in individuals, the adverse psychological effects can be severe and as a so that the treatment not than the
Industrial Psychiatry Journal · editorial or comment · 33 citationsread the source →
Problematic internet use in adolescents and implementation of a social media hygiene protocol.
Purpose: This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate whether a social media hygiene education intervention designed for adolescents with problematic internet use (PIU) receiving treatment at a pediatric outpatient mental health clinic reduced PIU and/or improved mental health outcomes in adolescents.
Methods: Participants were 28 adolescents (71.4% females, mean age = 14.2 years) with PIU seeking outpatient mental health treatment. The most common associated diagnoses were anxiety (42.9%) and attention-deficit activity disorder (28.6%). A within-adolescent pre-post design was used to evaluate changes in PIU severity measured by the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale-2 (GPIUS-2), depression and anxiety severity was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS), and screen time defined as the average hours/day during past 7-days recorded of the adolescent's smartphone. The practice change was an ad hoc social media hygiene education intervention conducted by their provider over five, once-a-week, one-hour telehealth sessions.
Results: A significant reduction in screen time (paired t = 10.14, df = 27, p < 0.001), severity of PIU (paired t = 12.07, df = 27, p < 0.001), and severity of depression and/or anxiety symptoms (paired t = 8.3, df = 27, p < 0.001) was demonstrated. Large effect sizes were observed (Cohen d = 1.6 to 2.3). Attendance for each session was 100% for Weeks 1, 2 and 5, 93% for Week 3 and 89% for Week 4.
Conclusion: The findings suggest administration of a social-media hygiene protocol conducted via telehealth may reduce the severity of PIU and improve mental health outcomes in adolescents seeking outpatient mental health treatment.
Journal of pediatric nursing · 5 citationsread the source →
Berkland BE, Werneburg BL, Jenkins SM, Friend JL, Clark MM, Rosedahl JK, Limburg PJ, Riley BA, Lecy DR, Sood A. (2017)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes A Worksite Wellness Intervention: Improving Happiness, Life Satisfaction, and Gratitude in Health Care Workers.
Objective: To assess the effect of a 12-week Stress Management and Resilience Training (SMART) program on happiness, life satisfaction, gratitude, mindfulness, spirituality, and stress in health care workers.
Participants and methods: Participants were members of an employee wellness center at an academic health care center. Participants were enrolled as cohorts of 12 to 18 individuals and received the intervention at an employee wellness center from February 19, 2013, to February 27, 2017. The study was designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm clinical trial that included a 3-month in-person SMART program (defined as the intervention), with an additional 3-month postintervention follow-up period (6 months total). Outcomes were assessed at baseline (T0), end of intervention (T3), and after the postintervention follow-up period (T6) and included Subjective Happiness Survey, Satisfaction with Life Scale, Gratitude Scale, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being, and Perceived Stress Scale.
Results: Of the 110 participants who enrolled and provided consent, 98 participants (89%) completed the T0 and T3 assessments and 85 participants (77%) completed the T0, T3, and T6 assessments. On comparing the T0 and T6 responses, we observed statistically significant improvements (P<.001) in all the domains studied: subjective happiness (baseline average, 4.6; T6 average, 5.5; average difference, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.0), life satisfaction (baseline average, 22.8; T6 average, 27.5; average difference, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.6-5.9); gratitude (baseline average, 35.8; T6 average, 39.3; average difference, 3.5; 95% CI, 2.6-4.5), mindfulness (baseline average, 3.5; T6 average, 4.2; average difference, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Spiritual Well-Being (baseline average, 29.9; T6 average, 37.4; average difference, 7.5; 95% CI, 6.0-9.2), and percentage of people reporting high stress (baseline, 97.6%; T6, 67.1%). Similar results were observed when comparing the T0 and T3 responses.
Conclusion: In health care workers, training in the SMART program was associated with statistically significant improvements in happiness, satisfaction with life, gratitude, mindfulness, spirituality, and stress (P<.001). Given the importance of stress in the workplace, larger randomized trials and broader dissemination of the program in health care workers is warranted.
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 19 citationsread the source →
Sexual victimisation, peer victimisation, and mental health outcomes among adolescents in Burkina Faso: a prospective cohort study.
Background: Sexual victimisation and peer victimisation are pervasive and increase risk for mental illness. Longitudinal studies that compare their unique and cumulative effects are scarce and have been done predominantly in high-income countries. The aims of this study were to examine the prevalence, prospective associations, and gender differences in sexual and peer victimisation and mental health in a low-income, African setting.
Methods: In this prospective cohort study, data were obtained from the 2017 ARISE Adolescent Health Study, a population-representative, two-wave, prospective study of adolescents (aged 12-20 years) from Burkina Faso. A random sample of adolescents was drawn from ten villages, selected to capture the five main ethnic groups, and from one of the seven sectors of Nouna town, Burkina Faso, at two timepoints: Nov 12 to Dec 27, 2017, and Nov 15 to Dec 20, 2018. Standardised interviews were conducted in French or a local language by trained researchers. We measured victimisation exposure as sexual victimisation, peer victimisation, and polyvictimisation, using lifetime frequency of exposure, and we measured mental health symptoms and disorders using the Kutcher Adolescent Depression Scale, the Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder screen IV and 5, and a question on lifetime self-harm and number of incidents in the past year. We calculated prevalence of victimisation and mental health symptoms and disorders at the two timepoints, and we used lifetime victimisation at the first timepoint to predict mental health at the second timepoint using logistic and negative binomial regressions. Gender differences were examined using interaction terms.
Findings: Of 2544 eligible adolescents, 1644 participated at time 1 and 1291 participated at time 2. The final sample with data at both timepoints included 1160 adolescents aged 12-20 years (mean 15·1, SE 0·2), of whom 469 (40·4%) were girls and 691 (59·6%) were boys. The majority ethnic group was Dafin (626 [39·1%]), followed by Bwaba (327 [20·5%]), Mossi (289 [16·0%]), Samo (206 [13·0%]), Peulh (166 [9·7%]), and other (30 [1·6%]). After survey weight adjustment, sexual victimisation (weighted percentages, time 1, 256 [13·8%] of 1620; time 2, 93 [7·2%] of 1264) and peer victimisation (weighted percentages, time 1, 453 [29·9%] of 1620; time 2, 272 [21·9%] of 1264) were common, whereas polyvictimisation was more rare (weighted percentages, time 1, 116 [6·6%] of 1620; time 2, 76 [5·7%] of 1264). Longitudinally, sexual victimisation was associated with probable clinical disorder (adjusted odds ratio 2·59, 95% CI 1·15-5·84), depressive symptoms (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 1·39, 95% CI 1·12-1·72), and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (aIRR 2·34, 1·31-4·16). Peer victimisation was associated with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (aIRR 1·89, 1·13-3·17) and polyvictimisation was associated with depressive symptoms (aIRR 1·34, 1·01-1·77). Girls reported more sexual victimisation (weighted percentages, 130 [17·3%] of 681 vs 126 [11·4%] of 939), boys reported more peer victimisation (weighted percentages, 290 [33·1%] of 939 vs 163 [25·2%] of 681), and there was a significant interaction between lifetime victimisation and gender for probable clinical disorder (F [degrees of freedom 7, sample 376] 2·16; p=0·030).
Interpretation: Sexual and peer victimisation were common in the study setting and increased risk for mental health problems. Adolescent girls who have been sexually victimised are especially at risk of mental health problems. Interventions targeting sexual and peer violence in low-income settings are needed.
Funding: Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, the Wellcome Trust, Fondation Botnar, and Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health.
The lancet. Psychiatry · 9 citationsread the source →
A Management Algorithm for Retained Rectal Foreign Bodies.
Few authors have proposed therapeutic protocols to manage retained rectal foreign bodies (RFBs). All patients with retained RFBs in hospitals across Trinidad and Tobago over 5 years were identified. Hospital records were retrieved and manually reviewed to extract the following data: demographics, history, foreign body retrieved, clinical signs at presentation, management strategy, duration of hospitalization, and morbidity and mortality. There were 10 patients with RFBs over the study period. The annual incidence of this phenomenon was 0.15 per 100,000 population. All patients were men at a mean age of 50.6 years (range: 27-83; SD = 15.3) who presented after a voluntary delay of 1.4 days (range: 0.5-2.5; SD = 0.7). Only one patient gave an accurate history on presentation, but all eventually admitted to self-insertion for sexual gratification. At presentation, one patient had a spontaneous rectal perforation (10%). The remaining nine patients had attempts at bedside transanal extraction, which was unsuccessful in 89% (8/9) of cases. The RFB was pushed beyond the grasp of forceps, making removal under anesthesia unsuccessful in 62.5% (5/8) cases. These patients required more invasive extraction methods including transanal minimally invasive surgery (1), laparoscopic-assisted advancement with transanal retrieval (1), and open surgery with transmural extraction and anastomoses (3). A management algorithm is proposed for the management of RFBs. Important points in this algorithm are the importance of clinician-patient rapport, early surgical referral, avoidance of bedside extraction in the emergency room, early examination under anesthesia, and the inclusion of emerging therapies such as transanal minimally invasive surgery.
American journal of men's health · 32 citationsread the source →
A Validation of Six Wearable Devices for Estimating Sleep, Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults.
The primary aim of this study was to examine the validity of six commonly used wearable devices, i.e., Apple Watch S6, Garmin Forerunner 245 Music, Polar Vantage V, Oura Ring Generation 2, WHOOP 3.0 and Somfit, for assessing sleep. The secondary aim was to examine the validity of the six devices for assessing heart rate and heart rate variability during, or just prior to, night-time sleep. Fifty-three adults (26 F, 27 M, aged 25.4 ± 5.9 years) spent a single night in a sleep laboratory with 9 h in bed (23:00-08:00 h). Participants were fitted with all six wearable devices-and with polysomnography and electrocardiography for gold-standard assessment of sleep and heart rate, respectively. Compared with polysomnography, agreement (and Cohen's kappa) for two-state categorisation of sleep periods (as sleep or wake) was 88% (κ = 0.30) for Apple Watch; 89% (κ = 0.35) for Garmin; 87% (κ = 0.44) for Polar; 89% (κ = 0.51) for Oura; 86% (κ = 0.44) for WHOOP and 87% (κ = 0.48) for Somfit. Compared with polysomnography, agreement (and Cohen's kappa) for multi-state categorisation of sleep periods (as a specific sleep stage or wake) was 53% (κ = 0.20) for Apple Watch; 50% (κ = 0.25) for Garmin; 51% (κ = 0.28) for Polar; 61% (κ = 0.43) for Oura; 60% (κ = 0.44) for WHOOP and 65% (κ = 0.52) for Somfit. Analyses regarding the two-state categorisation of sleep indicate that all six devices are valid for the field-based assessment of the timing and duration of sleep. However, analyses regarding the multi-state categorisation of sleep indicate that all six devices require improvement for the assessment of specific sleep stages. As the use of wearable devices that are valid for the assessment of sleep increases in the general community, so too does the potential to answer research questions that were previously impractical or impossible to address-in some way, we could consider that the whole world is becoming a sleep laboratory.
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 188 citationsread the source →
Go Where the Students Are: A Comparison of the Use of Social Networking Sites Between Medical Students and Medical Educators.
Background: Medical education has grown beyond the boundaries of the classroom, and social media is seen as the bridge between informal and formal learning as it keeps students highly engaged with educational content outside the classroom.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to explore the perceptions of medical educators and medical students regarding the use of social media for educational purposes.
Methods: Both groups (medical educators and students) were invited to take a survey. The surveys consisted of 29 questions, including Likert-style, multiple choice, yes/no, ranking, and short answer questions. The survey forms and statistics were built using Google Drive analytics with the free Spanning Stats module. To compare between professors and students, results were exported to a Microsoft Office Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA). The study protocol was approved by The Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board (OHSN-REB:20140680-01H).
Results: The overall response rate to the survey was 40.9% (63/154) for students, and 36% (72/200) for medical educators. The majority of educators (79%, 57/72) and students (100.0%, 63/63) had presence on social networking sites (SNSs). Only (33% 19/57) of educators used SNSs with their students, the most used sites were Facebook (52%, 10/19) and Twitter (47%, 9/19), followed by LinkedIn (21%, 4/19), Google+ (16%, 3/19),YouTube (11%, 2/19), and blogs (11%, 2/19). Facebook (100%, 63/63), YouTube (43%, 27/63), Twitter (31%, 20/63), and Instagram (30%, 19/63) were the sites most commonly used by students. The educators used SNSs mainly to post opinions (86%, 49/57), share videos (81%, 46/57), chat (71%, 41/57), engage in medical education (68%, 40/57), take surveys (24%, 14/57), and play games (5%, 3/57). On the other hand, students used SNSs mainly to chat with friends (94%, 59/63), for medical education purposes (67%, 42/63), to share videos (62%, 39/63), to post opinions (49%, 31/63), to take surveys (11%, 7/63), and to play games (6%, 4/63). Most educators (67%, 38/57) do not use social media in their education Although most of the educators (89%, 17/19) and students (73%, 46/63) found the use of social media time-effective, that it offered an inviting atmosphere (89%, 17/19 and 70%, 44/63), and that it enhanced the learning experience (95%, 18/19 and 70%, 44/63), both groups stated that they had colleagues who refused to use social media. The detractors' concerns included privacy issues (47%, 18/38), time-wasting (34%, 13/38), distraction (21%, 8/38), and that these media might not be suitable for education (11%, 4/38). When it came to using SNSs with the students, the educators most often used SNSs to post articles (42%, 8/19), explanatory comments (31%, 6/19), and videos (27%, 5/19).While students preferred the following posts : Quizzes (87% 55/63), revision files (82% 52/63) and explanatory comments (29% 21/63).
Conclusions: Although social media continue to grow, some educators find that they do not offer suitable modes of learning. However, it is important to acknowledge that there are persistent differences in technology adoption and use along gender, racial, and socioeconomic lines; this is often referred to as the "digital divide". The current study shows that students prefer certain posts like quizzes and revision files, while educators are focused on posting videos, articles, and explanatory comments. Medical educators are encouraged to focus on the students in a way to minimize the gap between learners and educators. It will remain our responsibility as educators to focuson the student, use SNSs at their fullest, and integrate them into traditional Web-based management systems and into existingcurricula to best benefit the students.
JMIR medical education · 49 citationsread the source →
Impaired survival and long-term neurological problems in benign meningioma.
Purpose: To assess long-term functional outcome and survival among patients with meningioma World Health Organization (WHO) grade I.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of 205 patients after resection of WHO grade I intracranial meningioma from 1985 through 2003. Expected age- and sex-specific survival was calculated by applying Dutch life-table statistics to each patient for the individual duration of follow-up. Long-term functional outcome was assessed using a mailed questionnaire to the general practitioner.
Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 11.5 years. Survival at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 92%, 81%, 63%, and 53%, respectively, which is significantly lower than the expected survival (94%, 86%, 78%, and 66%, respectively). Survival was worse with higher age (P < .001). Survival among patients younger than 45 years and older than 65 years was comparable to the expected survival but significantly worse among patients aged 45-65 years. Analysis of the cause of death suggests an excess mortality associated with both brain tumor death and stroke (P = .07). Recurrence rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 18%, 26%, and 32%, respectively. Higher Simpson grade (P < .001) and lower age (P = .02) were associated with a higher recurrence rate. In 29 patients (14%) receiving radiotherapy, the 5-year recurrence rate was 18% and the 5-year survival was only 58%. Long-term functioning (≥ 5 years after last treatment) could be assessed in 89 long-term survivors: 29 patients (33%) showed no deficits, and 60 (67%) showed at least 1 neurological symptom, of whom 24 (27%) were unable to perform normal daily activities.
Conclusion: Long-term survival in WHO grade I meningioma is challenged in patients more than 45 years of age. Excess mortality seems to be associated with both tumor recurrence and stroke. The majority of patients have long-term neurological problems.
Neuro-oncology · 165 citationsread the source →
Daskalopoulou M, Rodger A, Phillips AN, Sherr L, Speakman A, Collins S, Elford J, Johnson MA, Gilson R, Fisher M, Wilkins E, Anderson J, McDonnell J, Edwards S, Perry N, O'Connell R, Lascar M, Jones M, Johnson AM, Hart G, Miners A, Geretti AM, Burman WJ, Lampe FC. (2014)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usThe lancet. HIV Recreational drug use, polydrug use, and sexual behaviour in HIV-diagnosed men who have sex with men in the UK: results from the cross-sectional ASTRA study.
Background: Recreational drug use in men who have sex with men (MSM) is of concern because it might be linked to the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections. Evidence about drug use in HIV-diagnosed MSM in the UK is limited by representativeness of the study populations. We describe patterns of drug use and associations with sexual behaviours in HIV-diagnosed MSM in the UK.
Methods: We used data from the cross-sectional ASTRA study, which recruited participants aged 18 years or older with HIV from eight HIV outpatient clinics in the UK between Feb 1, 2011, and Dec 31, 2012. We examined data for MSM, assessing the prevalence of recreational drug use and polydrug use in the previous 3 months and associations with sociodemographic and HIV-related factors. We examined the association of polydrug use with measures of condomless sex in the previous 3 months and with other sexual behaviours.
Findings: Our analysis included data for 2248 MSM: 2136 (95%) were gay, 1973 (89%) were white, 1904 (85%) were on antiretroviral treatment (ART), and 1682 (76%) had a viral load of 50 copies per mL or lower. 1138 (51%) used recreational drugs in the previous 3 months; 608 (27%) used nitrites, 477 (21%) used cannabis, 460 (21%) used erectile dysfunction drugs, 453 (20%) used cocaine, 280 (13%) used ketamine, 258 (12%) used 3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylamphetamine (MDMA), 221 (10%) used gamma-hydroxybutyrate or gamma-butyrolactone, 175 (8%) used methamphetamine, and 162 (7%) used mephedrone. In the 1138 individuals who used drugs, 529 (47%) used three or more drugs and 241 (21%) used five or more. Prevalence of injection drug use was 3% (n = 68). Drug use was independently associated with younger age (p < 0·0001), not being religious (p = 0·001), having an HIV-positive stable partner (p = 0·0008), HIV-serostatus disclosure (p = 0·009), smoking (p < 0·0001), evidence of harmful alcohol drinking (p = 0·0001), and ART non-adherence (p < 0·0001). Increasing polydrug use was associated with increasing prevalence of condomless sex (prevalence range from no drug use to use of five or more drugs was 24% to 78%), condomless sex with HIV-seroconcordant partners (17% to 69%), condomless sex with HIV-serodiscordant partners (10% to 25%), and higher-HIV-risk condomless sex after taking viral load into account (4% to 16%; p ≤ 0·005 for all). Associations were similar after adjustment for sociodemographic and HIV-related factors. Methamphetamine was more strongly associated with higher-HIV-risk condomless sex than were other commonly used drugs.
Interpretation: Polydrug use is prevalent in HIV-diagnosed MSM and is strongly associated with condomless sex. Specialist support services for MSM with HIV who use recreational drugs might be beneficial in the reduction of harm and prevention of ongoing transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.
Funding: National Institute for Health Research.
The lancet. HIV · 226 citationsread the source →
Dikshit R, Gupta PC, Ramasundarahettige C, Gajalakshmi V, Aleksandrowicz L, Badwe R, Kumar R, Roy S, Suraweera W, Bray F, Mallath M, Singh PK, Sinha DN, Shet AS, Shet AS, Gelband H, Jha P, Million Death Study Collaborators. (2012)MEDLINE-indexed journal, not yet read by usLancet (London, England) Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey.
Background: The age-specific mortality rates and total deaths from specific cancers have not been documented for the various regions and subpopulations of India. We therefore assessed the cause of death in 2001-03 in homes in small areas that were chosen to be representative of all the parts of India.
Methods: At least 130 trained physicians independently assigned causes to 122,429 deaths, which occurred in 1·1 million homes in 6671 small areas that were randomly selected to be representative of all of India, based on a structured non-medical surveyor's field report.
Findings: 7137 of 122,429 study deaths were due to cancer, corresponding to 556,400 national cancer deaths in India in 2010. 395,400 (71%) cancer deaths occurred in people aged 30-69 years (200,100 men and 195,300 women). At 30-69 years, the three most common fatal cancers were oral (including lip and pharynx, 45,800 [22·9%]), stomach (25,200 [12·6%]), and lung (including trachea and larynx, 22,900 [11·4%]) in men, and cervical (33,400 [17·1%]), stomach (27,500 [14·1%]), and breast (19,900 [10·2%]) in women. Tobacco-related cancers represented 42·0% (84,000) of male and 18·3% (35,700) of female cancer deaths and there were twice as many deaths from oral cancers as lung cancers. Age-standardised cancer mortality rates per 100,000 were similar in rural (men 95·6 [99% CI 89·6-101·7] and women 96·6 [90·7-102·6]) and urban areas (men 102·4 [92·7-112·1] and women 91·2 [81·9-100·5]), but varied greatly between the states, and were two times higher in the least educated than in the most educated adults (men, illiterate 106·6 [97·4-115·7] vs most educated 45·7 [37·8-53·6]; women, illiterate 106·7 [99·9-113·6] vs most educated 43·4 [30·7-56·1]). Cervical cancer was far less common in Muslim than in Hindu women (study deaths 24, age-standardised mortality ratio 0·68 [0·64-0·71] vs 340, 1·06 [1·05-1·08]).
Interpretation: Prevention of tobacco-related and cervical cancers and earlier detection of treatable cancers would reduce cancer deaths in India, particularly in the rural areas that are underserved by cancer services. The substantial variation in cancer rates in India suggests other risk factors or causative agents that remain to be discovered.
Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and US National Institutes of Health.
Lancet (London, England) · 296 citationsread the source →
Glossary of Descriptive Terminology for Ictal Semiology: Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification and Terminology
INTRODUCTION PRINCIPLES FOR TERMS AND DEFINITIONS DATA SOURCES I GENERAL TERMS 1.0 SEMIOLOGY 2.0 EPILEPTIC SEIZURE 3.0 ICTUS 4.0 EPILEPSY 5.0 FOCAL 6.0 GENERALIZED 7.0 CONVULSION II TERMS DESCRIBING EPILEPTIC SEIZURE SEMIOLOGY 1.0 MOTOR 1.1 ELEMENTARY MOTOR 1.1.1 TONIC 1.1.1.1 EPILEPTIC SPASM 1.1.1.2 POSTURAL 1.1.1.2.1 VERSIVE 1.1.1.2.2 DYSTONIC 1.1.2 MYOCLONIC 1.1.2.1 NEGATIVE MYOCLONIC 1.1.2.2 CLONIC 1.1.2.2.1 JACKSONIAN MARCH 1.1.3 TONIC-CLONIC 1.1.3.1 GENERALIZED TONIC-CLONIC SEIZURE 1.1.4 ATONIC 1.1.5 ASTATIC 1.1.6 SYNCHRONOUS 1.2 AUTOMATISM 1.2.1 OROALIMENTARY 1.2.2 MIMETIC 1.2.3 MANUAL OR PEDAL 1.2.4 GESTURAL 1.2.5 HYPERKINETIC 1.2.6 HYPOKINETIC 1.2.7 DYSPHASIC 1.2.8 DYSPRAXIC 1.2.9 GELASTIC 1.2.10 DACRYSTIC 1.2.11 VOCAL 1.2.12 VERBAL 1.2.13 SPONTANEOUS 1.2.14 INTERACTIVE 2.0 NON-MOTOR 2.1 AURA 2.2 SENSORY 2.2.1 ELEMENTARY 2.2.1.1 SOMATOSENSORY 2.2.1.2 VISUAL 2.2.1.3 AUDITORY 2.2.1.4 OLFACTORY 2.2.1.5 GUSTATORY 2.2.1.6 EPIGASTRIC 2.2.1.7 CEPHALIC 2.2.1.8 AUTONOMIC 2.2.2 EXPERIENTIAL 2.2.2.1 AFFECTIVE 2.2.2.2 MNEMONIC 2.2.2.3 HALLUCINATORY 2.2.2.4 ILLUSORY 2.3 DYSCOGNITIVE 3.0 AUTONOMIC EVENTS 3.1 AUTONOMIC AURA 3.2 AUTONOMIC SEIZURE 4.0 SOMATOTOPIC MODIFIERS 4.1 LATERALITY 4.1.1 UNILATERAL 4.1.1.1 HEMI- 4.1.2 GENERALIZED (syn. “bilateral”) 4.1.2.1 ASYMMETRICAL 4.1.2.2 SYMMETRICAL 4.2 BODY PART 4.3 CENTRICITY 4.3.1 AXIAL 4.3.2 PROXIMAL LIMB 4.3.3 DISTAL LIMB 5.0 MODIFIERS AND DESCRIPTORS OF SEIZURE TIMING 5.1 INCIDENCE 5.1.1 REGULAR, IRREGULAR 5.1.2 CLUSTER 5.1.3 PROVOCATIVE FACTOR 5.1.3.1 REACTIVE 5.1.3.2 REFLEX 5.2 STATE DEPENDENT 5.3 CATAMENIAL 6.0 DURATION 6.1 STATUS EPILEPTICUS 7.0 SEVERITY 8.0 PRODROME 9.0 POSTICTAL PHENOMENON 9.1 LATERALIZING (TODD'S (OR BRAVAIS') PHENOMENON 9.2 NON-LATERALIZING PHENOMENON 9.2.1 IMPAIRED COGNITION 9.2.1.1 ANTEROGRADE AMNESIA 9.2.1.2 RETROGRADE AMNESIA 9.2.2 PSYCHOSIS This glossary intends to provide a standard terminology for health care workers to communicate what is observed and what a patient reports during a seizure. As this terminology is descriptive and phenomenologic, its use would not imply or require knowledge of ictal pathophysiology, any pathological substrate, or etiology. Many terms are adjectives modifying “seizure,” which itself is defined under “general terms.” This pertains to seizures with single or multiple components. Terms in this glossary (e.g., “seizure,”“ictus,” which have widespread applicability in other fields of clinical neuroscience) are herein defined according to their references to epilepsy. Some terms of this glossary are “fundamental” (i.e., they encompass other more precise words). These can be used as the sole descriptor when data to characterize a phenomenon more precisely are not available. Such include aura, automatism, experiential, motor, and sensory. A seizure will often consist of two or more phenomena occurring simultaneously or sequentially and should be described accordingly. Quantitative terms, such as duration of motor events, are not intended as immutable confines, but as clarifying guides to describe clinically observed events. Scientific progress dictates an evolution of terms to retain their relevance. However, needs of communication in everyday life require that changes be gradual and evolutionary rather than abrupt and revolutionary. The use of synonyms in this glossary reflects incidents in which gradual changes are likely. Terminology in some areas remains unresolved. Therefore we view this glossary as a dynamic process for which feedback will be welcomed. In developing the “lexique” of this report, we adopted and applied the following principles. Terms and definitions should Contain features that distinguish or modify seizure entities. Be descriptive of the phenomena involved. Comply with terminology of clinical neuroscience. Use current terminology and definitions wherever possible. Contain new terms only if necessary. Be easily translatable to other languages. Be readily understood and used by potential users. That branch of linguistics concerned with signs and symptoms. Manifestation(s) of epileptic (excessive and/or hypersynchronous), usually self-limited activity of neurons in the brain. A sudden neurologic occurrence such as a stroke or an epileptic seizure. Epileptic Disorder: A chronic neurologic condition characterized by recurrent epileptic seizures. Epilepsies: Those conditions involving chronic recurrent epileptic seizures that can be considered epileptic disorders. A seizure whose initial semiology indicates, or is consistent with, initial activation of only part of one cerebral hemisphere. A seizure whose initial semiology indicates, or is consistent with, more than minimal involvement of both cerebral hemispheres. Primarily a lay term. Episodes of excessive, abnormal muscle contractions, usually bilateral, which may be sustained or interrupted. These are descriptors of seizures unless specified otherwise. Involves musculature in any form. The motor event could consist of an increase (positive) or decrease (negative) in muscle contraction to produce a movement. Unless noted, the following terms are adjectives modifying “motor seizure” or “seizure” (e.g., “tonic motor seizure or dystonic seizure”), and whose definitions can usually be understood as prefaced by “refers to …”. A single type of contraction of a muscle or group of muscles that is usually stereotyped and not decomposable into phases. (However, see tonic–clonic, an elementary motor sequence). A sustained increase in muscle contraction lasting a few seconds to minutes. Noun: A sudden flexion, extension, or mixed extension–flexion of predominantly proximal and truncal muscles that is usually more sustained than a myoclonic movement but not so sustained as a tonic seizure (i.e., ∼1 s). Limited forms may occur: grimacing, head nodding. Epileptic spasms frequently occur in clusters. Adoption of a posture that may be bilaterally symmetric or asymmetric (as in a “fencing posture”). A sustained, forced conjugate ocular, cephalic, and/or truncal rotation or lateral deviation from the midline. Sustained contractions of both agonist and antagonist muscles producing athetoid or twisting movements, which, when prolonged, may produce abnormal postures. Sudden, brief (<100 ms) involuntary single or multiple contraction(s) of muscles(s) or muscle groups of variable topography (axial, proximal limb, distal). Interruption of tonic muscular activity for <500 ms without evidence of preceding myoclonia. Myoclonus that is regularly repetitive, involves the same muscle groups, at a frequency of ∼2–3 c/s, and is prolonged. Synonym: rhythmic myoclonus. Noun: Traditional term indicating spread of clonic movements through contiguous body parts unilaterally. A sequence consisting of a tonic followed by a clonic phase. Variants such as clonic–tonic–clonic may be seen. Noun: Bilateral symmetric tonic contraction and then bilateral clonic contractions of somatic muscles, usually associated with autonomic phenomena. Sudden loss or diminution of muscle tone without apparent preceding myoclonic or tonic event lasting ≥1 to 2 s, involving head, trunk, jaw, or limb musculature. Loss of erect posture that results from an atonic, myoclonic, or tonic mechanism. Synonym: drop attack. Motor events occurring (not) at the same time or at the same rate in sets of body parts. Noun: A more or less coordinated, repetitive, motor activity usually occurring when cognition is impaired and for which the subject is usually amnesic afterward. This often resembles a voluntary movement and may consist of an inappropriate continuation of ongoing preictal motor activity. The following adjectives are usually employed to modify “automatism.” Lip smacking, lip pursing, chewing, licking, tooth grinding, or swallowing. Facial expression suggesting an emotional state, often fear. Indicates principally distal components, bilateral or unilateral. Fumbling, tapping, manipulating movements. Often unilateral. Fumbling or exploratory movements with the hand, directed toward self or environment. Movements resembling those intended to lend further emotional tone to speech. Involves predominantly proximal limb or axial muscles producing irregular sequential ballistic movements, such as pedaling, pelvic thrusting, thrashing, rocking movements. Increase in rate of ongoing movements or inappropriately rapid performance of a movement. A decrease in amplitude and/or rate or arrest of ongoing motor activity. Impaired communication involving language without dysfunction of relevant primary motor or sensory pathways, manifested as impaired comprehension, anomia, paraphasic errors, or a combination of these. Inability to perform learned movements spontaneously or on command or imitation despite intact relevant motor and sensory systems and adequate comprehension and cooperation. Bursts of laughter or giggling, usually without an appropriate affective tone. Bursts of crying. Single or repetitive utterances consisting of sounds such as grunts or shrieks. Single or repetitive utterances consisting of words, phrases, or brief sentences. Stereotyped, involve only self, virtually independent of environmental influences. Not stereotyped, involve more than self, environmentally influenced. Noun: A subjective ictal phenomenon that, in a given patient, may precede an observable seizure; if alone, constitutes a sensory seizure. A perceptual experience not caused by appropriate stimuli in the external world. Modifies “seizure” or “aura.” A single, unformed phenomenon involving one primary sensory modality (e.g., somatosensory, visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory, epigastric, or cephalic). Tingling, numbness, electric-shock sensation, pain, sense of movement, or desire to move. Flashing or flickering lights, spots, simple patterns, scotomata, or amaurosis. Buzzing, drumming sounds or single tones. Odor, usually disagreeable. Taste sensations including acidic, bitter, salty, sweet, or metallic. Abdominal discomfort including nausea, emptiness, tightness, churning, butterflies, malaise, pain, and hunger; sensation may rise to chest or throat. Some phenomena may reflect ictal autonomic dysfunction. Sensation in the head such as light-headedness, tingling or headache. A sensation consistent with involvement of the autonomic nervous system, including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, sudomotor, vasomotor, and thermoregulatory functions. (Thus “autonomic aura”; cf. “autonomic events” 3.0). Affective, mnemonic, or composite perceptual phenomena including illusory or composite hallucinatory events; these may appear alone or in combination. Included are feelings of depersonalization. These phenomena have subjective qualities similar to those experienced in life but are recognized by the subject as occurring outside of actual context. Components include fear, depression, joy, and (rarely) anger. Components that reflect ictal dysmnesia such as feelings of familiarity (déjà-vu) and unfamiliarity (jamais-vu). A creation of composite perceptions without corresponding external stimuli involving visual, auditory, somatosensory, olfactory, and/or gustatory phenomena. Example: “hearing” and “seeing” people talking. An alteration of actual percepts involving the visual, auditory, somatosensory, olfactory, or gustatory systems. The term describes events in which (1) disturbance of cognition is the predominant or most apparent feature, and (2a) two or more of the following components are involved, or (2b) involvement of such components remains undetermined. Otherwise, use the more specific term (e.g., “mnemonic experiential seizure” or “hallucinatory experiential seizure”). Components of cognition: perception: symbolic conception of sensory information attention: appropriate selection of a principal perception or task emotion: appropriate affective significance of a perception memory: ability to store and retrieve percepts or concepts executive function: anticipation, selection, monitoring of consequences, and initiation of motor activity including praxis, speech A sensation consistent with involvement of the autonomic nervous system, including cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, sudomotor, vasomotor, and thermoregulatory functions (see 2.2.1.8). An objectively documented and distinct alteration of autonomic nervous system function involving cardiovascular, pupillary, gastrointestinal, sudomotor, vasomotor, and thermoregularity functions. Exclusive or virtually exclusive involvement of one side as a motor, sensory, or autonomic phenomenon. A prefix to other descriptors (e.g., hemiclonic). More than minimal involvement of each side as a motor, elementary sensory, or autonomic phenomenon. Motor component: further modified as Clear distinction in quantity and/or distribution of behavior on the two sides. Virtual bilateral equality in these respects. Refers to area involved (i.e., arm, leg, face, trunk, and other). Modifier describes proximity to the body axis. Involves trunk, including neck. Signifies involvement from shoulders to wrist, hip to ankle. Indicates involvement of fingers, hands, toes, and/or feet. The following terms are listed in the form (adjective, noun, verb) according to principal usage; as adjective unless specified. Noun: Refers to the number of epileptic seizures within a time period or the number of seizure days per unit of time. Consistent (inconsistent) or predictable (unpredictable, chaotic) intervals between such events. Noun: Incidence of seizures within a given period (usually one or a few days) that exceeds the average incidence over a longer period for the patient. Verb: To vary in incidence as above. Noun: Transient and sporadic endogenous or exogenous element capable of augmenting seizure incidence in persons with chronic epilepsy and evoking seizures in susceptible individuals without epilepsy. Occurring in association with transient systemic perturbation such as intercurrent illness, sleep loss, or emotional stress. Objectively and consistently demonstrated to be evoked by a specific afferent stimulus or by activity of the patient. Afferent stimuli can be elementary[i.e., unstructured (light flashes, startle, a monotone)] or elaborate[i.e., structured, (a symphony)]. Activity may be elementary [e.g., motor (a movement)]; or elaborate [e.g., cognitive function (reading, chess playing)], or both (reading aloud). Occurring exclusively or primarily in the various stages of drowsiness, sleep, or arousal. Seizures occurring principally or exclusively in any one phase of the menstrual cycle. Time between the beginning of initial seizure manifestations, such as the aura, and the cessation of experienced or observed seizure activity. Does not include nonspecific seizure premonitions or postictal states. A seizure that shows no clinical signs of arresting after a duration encompassing the great majority of seizures of that type in most patients or recurrent seizures without interictal resumption of baseline central nervous system function. A multicomponent assessment of a seizure by observers and the patient. Components primarily of observer assessment include duration, extent of motor involvement, impairment of cognitive interaction with environment intraictally, maximal number of seizures per unit of time. Components primarily of patient assessment: extent of injury; emotional, social, and vocational consequences of the attack. A preictal phenomenon. A subjective or objective clinical alteration (e.g., ill-localized sensation or agitation) that heralds the onset of an epileptic seizure but does not form part of it. A transient clinical abnormality of central nervous system function that appears or becomes accentuated when clinical signs of the ictus have ended. Any unilateral postictal dysfunction relating to motor, language, sensory, and/or integrative functions including visual, auditory, or somatosensory neglect phenomena. Impaired cognition, amnesia, psychosis. Decreased cognitive performance involving one or more of perception, attention, emotion, memory, execution, praxis, speech (cf., Dyscognitive, 2.3). Impaired ability to remember new material. Impaired ability to recall previously remembered material. Misinterpretation of external world in an awake, alert person; involves thought disorder of emotion and socialization. Adams RD, Victor M. Principles of neurology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993. Aicardi J. Epilepsy in children: International Review of Child Neurology series. New York: Raven Press, 1986, 1994. Benson DF. The neurology of thinking. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994: 224–5. Blume WT, Berkovic S, Dulac O. Search for a better classification of the epilepsies. In: Engel J Jr, Pedley TA, eds. Epilepsy: a comprehensive textbook. Vol 1. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997:779–89. Delgado-Escueta AV, Serratosa JM, Medina MT. Myoclonic seizures, and progressive myoclonus epilepsy syndromes. In: Wyllie E, ed. The treatment of epilepsy: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996:467–83. Engel J Jr. Seizures and epilepsy. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company, 1989. Engel J Jr, Pedley TA. Epilepsy: a comprehensive textbook. Vol. 1–3. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997. Gastaut H, Broughton R. Epileptic seizures: clinical and electrographic features, diagnosis and treatment. Springfield, Ill: Charles C Thomas, 1972. Gloor P. Consciousness as a neurological concept in epileptology: a critical review. Epilepsia 1986;27(suppl 2):S14–26. Gloor P. The temporal lobe and limbic system. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997. Hopkins AP, Michael WF. Spinal myoclonus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1974;37:1112–5. Luders H, Acharya J, Baumgartner C, et al. Semiological seizure classification. Epilepsia 1998;39:1006–13. Luders H, Acharya J, Baumgartner C, et al. A new seizure classification based exclusively on ictal semiology [Editorial]. Acta Neurol Scand 1999;99:137–41. Moscovitch M. Information processing and the cerebral hemispheres. In: Gazzaniga MS, ed. Handbook of behavioral neurobiology: neuropsychology. Vol 2. New York: Plenum, 1979:379–446. Penfield W, Jasper HH. Epilepsy and functional anatomy of the human brain. Boston: Little, Brown, to clinical Boston: Little, and Company, of ed. Philadelphia: & 1989. Epileptic In: Wyllie E, ed. The treatment of epilepsy: principles and practice. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, P. Epileptic seizures and syndromes. 1994. and impaired a clinical New York: McGraw-Hill, of Neurol ed. The Oxford ed. Press, of the eds.
Epilepsia · 862 citationsread the source →